Understanding Professional Advocacy: A Mixed Method Approach to Explore Professional Nurse Advocacy and Professional Midwifery Advocacy in one NHS Trust

Author:

Engward Hilary1,Goldspink Sally1,Abdulmohdi Naim1,Alexander Marie2

Affiliation:

1. Anglia Ruskin University

2. East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Background: In the UK, specific Professional Nurse Advocates (PNA) and Professional Midwifery Advocates (PMA) centres nurses and midwives as integral to quality improvement in practice (QiP), workforce retention and transformation. However, little is known about the potential impact the PNA/PMA role might have on the daily practice of nurses and midwives, quality in practice, professional wellbeing, and retention. This project, funded by one large NHS Trust in the UK, seeks to explore, and understand the impact (if any) of the PNA/PMA role in relation to nurse/midwife involvement in QiP, professional wellbeing, and the retention of nurses/midwives in that Trust. The focus is on the key issues of the lived experience of current PNA’s/PMA’s; the wider nursing/midwifery workforce perspective of the use (or no use of) of the PNA/PNA role; the link (if any) on quality improvement in practice (QiP); and the workforce impact (if any) on nurse/midwife professional wellbeing and nurse/midwife retention in the organisation. Methods: This study is mixed method and multistage design: Workstream 1 identifies the organisational context statistics of QiP, wellbeing and retention to understand difference (if any) before and after the implementation of the PNA/PMA role. Workstream 2 explores the experience of being a PNA/PMA using semi-structured interviews (n 15). Workstream 3 is twofold: Part i surveys the nurse and midwifery staff (n = 450) awareness/access/understanding of the PNA/PMA role. Part ii includes two focus groups (n = 20) to detail the experiences of those who have actively consulted with a PNA/PMA, the other for those who have not yet consulted with PNA/PMA. Workstream 4 collates collected evidence to co-design, with PNAs/PMAs, nurses and midwives, recommendations for local policy, practice, and the implementation of the PNA/PMA role across the organisation. Discussion: The integrated findings will inform the future organisational implementation of the PMA/ PNA role, strategies to develop the PNA/PMA role in relation to QiP, staff wellbeing, retention and sustainable approaches for increasing the number of PNA/PMA’s. The evidence will inform local and national implementation policy across diverse NHS services and future development of the professional advocacy role for allied health professionals. Trial registration NA

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. West M, Bailey S, Williams E. The courage of compassion supporting nurses and midwives to deliver high-quality care. 2020. Kings Fund, London. URL https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/courage-compassion-supporting-nurses-midwives [accessed 2021-08-01].

2. Ariss SM, Earley V, Jokhi R, Merodoulaki M. Final evaluation report: Pilot for new model of midwifery supervision. 2017. London: NHS England. URL https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83942275.pdf [accessed 2022-07-14].

3. England NHS. A-EQUIP a new model of midwifery supervision – Operational Guidance. 2017. NHS England. URL https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/a-equip-a-model-of-clinical-midwifery-supervision/ [accessed 2022-07-25].

4. Whatley V, Stephens L, Sterry M. Professional advocates: Investing in practitioners to achieve excellence in service delivery. BMJ Blog: Evidence-based nursing, 6 June 2021. URL https://tinyurl.com/h86k5pep [accessed 2022-07-30].

5. NHS England. We are the NHS: People plan 2020/21 - action for us all. 2020. URL https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/We_Are_The_NHS_Action_For_All_Of_Us_FINAL_24_08_20.pdf [accessed 2022-09-01].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3