The Selection of Chief Residents across Residency Programs at a Large Academic Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background Chief residents have a unique role in graduate medical education (GME). They not only connect residents with program and hospital leadership, but also advocate for the wellbeing and educational priorities of trainees. Previous studies have focused on describing the characteristics of chief residents (CRs), however little is known about how CRs are selected across GME programs. Methods One-on-one semi-structured interviews with all (n = 21) GME program directors at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine were conducted from January to March 2022. Investigators independently coded the transcripts using an inductive approach to categorize meaningful segments of text; this culminated in the identification of explanatory themes. Results From discussions with 21 program directors, four themes were identified: (1) identifying candidates: timing, recruitment, nominations, as well as the desirable attributes; (2) application processes: expression of intent, submission of materials, and participation in interviews; (3) selection: voting, discussions leading to consensus, and program director intimately involved in the choice(s); and (4) confidence in process and outcomes. Conclusions Our results provide a deeper understanding of the nuances associated with the selection of CRs. It is hoped that the descriptions of the similarities and differences across GME programs will prompt reflection about what is done at one institution such that all programs can consider what are the best practices to serve their individual goals and needs.