Perspectives on consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness from brain injury: Group concept mapping study across clinic, research, and families

Abstract

Abstract Background An effective healthcare system is dependent on interactions between clinic, research, and patient/relatives. Such interactions may at their core be challenged by misalignments of concepts and the practices that constitute them. The concept of consciousness and what is experienced and understood as signs of consciousness in patients with severe acquired brain injury is one of these potential areas of misalignment. Different perspectives and experiences of consciousness are challenging the delivery of care and the high-stake decision-making process on the potential withdrawal of treatment. The enhanced uncertainties call for reflections on how consciousness is perceived and identified by key stakeholders in current clinical encounters and practice. The study provides a first step towards a future framework for the difficult process of decision-making concerning a segment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Methods The study empirically explores the actual experiences and conceptions of consciousness in relation to patients with DoC from the perspectives of researchers, health professionals, and relatives of patients, to understand the challenges of the diversity of understandings of consciousness. Engaging the stakeholders by employing Group Concept Mapping methodology, the study developed a situated conceptual map, which reflects nuances and importance of perspectives on and signs of consciousness. Results The conceptual mapping demonstrates an extensive overlap in perspectives on consciousness among participants, prioritizing signs that are observable at the bedside. Based on the analysis of rating of perspectives and a validation workshop a situated conceptual map was develop to guide conceptual alignment when encountering divergent perspectives on consciousness in patients with DoC. Conclusions The study highlights the importance of repeatable signs of consciousness observed at the bedside and the patient’s ability to participate in social interactions, while also considering the importance of non-clinically observable signs of consciousness.