Comparing patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders pre- and post-surgical management: A systematic review protocol

Author:

Hoque Sheymonti Shahreen1ORCID,Ahern Susannah1,O’Connell Helen E.2,Romero Lorena3,Ruseckaite Rasa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Monash University Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine

2. The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery

3. Ian Potter Library: The Alfred

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pelvic floor disorders including stress urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse affect more than 50% of Australian women. Pelvic floor disorders cause a wide range of symptoms including painful urination, constipation and lower back pain. Previous surgical treatment may also affect the presence of pelvic symptoms, including pelvic pain, vaginal pain and dyspareunia which can lead to poor health-related quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures are an important way of examining the health-related quality of life of women with pelvic floor disorders pre- and post-surgery, however, there are very few patient-reported outcome measures measuring this important domain of pelvic or vaginal pain. This paper aims to identify and compare patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with a pelvic floor disorder in the existing literature, as well as to explore and highlight the gaps regarding the development and validation of a pain instrument. This review also aims to describe the modes and methods for administration of the instruments. Methods: This review will be conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline and checklist. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL Plus and Ovid PsychInfo databases as well as the grey literature will be searched for studies that use, develop or implement patient-reported outcome measures for pain as an HRQoL outcome in adult women with a pelvic floor disorder pre- and post-surgery. Studies reporting on the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures will be included. An independent researcher will screen the title and abstracts of the studies. Two independent researchers will undertake full-text review and any disagreements will be resolved through discussion and consensus. The final selected studies will undergo data extraction, qualitative analysis and synthesis. Discussion: The findings of this review will assist with the development and validation of new pain-specific patient-reported outcome measures for women with pelvic floor disorder in the registry or clinical practice. Trial registration: CRD42022319663

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Cleveland Clinic. Pelvic floor dysfunction: symptoms, causes and treatment [Internet]. Cleveland, Ohio: Cleveland Clinic; 2020 [updated 2020 May 26; cited 2021 Aug 19]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/14459-pelvic-floor-dysfunction.

2. Pelvic organ prolapse in women: how is it diagnosed and treated currently? Prz Menopauzalny;Milart P,2015

3. Pelvic organ prolapse – a review;Dietz HP;AFP,2015

4. Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence: recommendations of the Urodynamic Society;Blavias JG;Neurourol Urodyn,1997

5. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery;MacLennan AH;BJOG,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3