Affiliation:
1. King's College London
2. Strathmore University
3. Makerere University
4. University of Warwick
5. University of Oxford
6. University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Medicine
Abstract
AbstractBackground:Regulating health professionals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is a key challenge. While holding potential to improve professional practice and patient care, regulation is often weakly implemented and enforced across LMIC health systems, allowing poor practices to continue. Therefore, there is need to understand how regulation can be improved across resource constrained LMIC health systems.Methods: We conducted mixed-methods research on health professional regulation in Uganda and Kenya (2019-2021), using qualitative interviews with national regulatory stakeholders, sub-national regulatory actors, ‘frontline’ doctors and nurses/midwives, and a bi-national survey.Results: Due to resource constraints, Kenyan and Ugandan regulators were generally perceived to be ‘remote’ and ‘out of touch’ with ‘frontline’ professionals. Weak regulation was blamed for failing to address widespread malpractice and inadequate standards of health professional training. However, doctors and nurses/midwives were positive about online licencing and regulation where they had relationships with accessible regulators.Conclusion:We propose an ambidextrous approach to regulatory improvement in resource constrained LMIC health systems; simultaneously deconcentrating regulatory monitoring and support to local level, to address frontline problems, while funding this using efficiency savings from developing and streamlining online regulatory administration.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. 1. Sheikh K, Saligram P, Prasad L. Mapping the regulatory architecture for health care delivery in mixed health systems in low-and middle-income countries. Health Policy and Finance Knowledge Hub, Working Paper Series. 2013;26.
2. 2. WHO. World Alliance for Patient Safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004.
3. 3. Sutherland K, Leatherman S. Regulation and Quality Improvement: A Review of the Evidence. London: Health Foundation; 2006.
4. 4. Teerawattananon Y, Tangcharoensathien V, Tantivess S, Mills A. Health sector regulation in Thailand: recent progress and the future agenda. Health Policy. 2003;63(3):323 − 38.
5. 5. Ensor T, Weinzierl S. Regulating health care in low- and middle-income countries: Broadening the policy response in resource constrained environments. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;65(2):355 − 66.