Affiliation:
1. University of Zaragoza
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of the use of a combined infiltration between popliteal artery and knee capsule (IPACK) anesthetic block together with selective saphenous nerve block, versus local infiltration with anesthetic in knee replacement surgery.
METHODS
A retrospective observational study was performed. There were reviewed 312 patients who underwent primary total knee prosthesis at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022, regardless of the reason for the surgical indication. Between January 2019 and November 2021, 207 patients were performed local intraarticular anesthesia (LIA) during the surgery. Since November 2021 to December 2022, 105 patients received the combined nerve blocks (IPACK + ACB group). The average age in the LIA group was 72.9 years while in the blocks group it was 70.4 years. There were 44% of men in the LIA group and 53.3% in the blocks group.
The primary outcome was the presence of poorly controlled pain that requires opioid analgesic rescue in the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included pain scores measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion assessed with a goniometer and hospital length stay.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in age or sex patient distribution between the two groups.
Only one patient treated with anesthetic blocks required rescue analgesia with minor opioids. Patients treated with LIA required treatment with minor opioids in 28.5% of cases. There were not statistically significant differences (p = 0.0964) between VAS in the LIA group and in the blocks group in the first 24h, although patients treated with LIA presented less elevated VAS data (mean 2.3 versus 2.7). The range of motion was slightly greater (4.6º, statistically significant data, < 0.05) in the blocks group. There were statistically significant differences in terms of hospital stay (2.4 days in the blocks group and 2.8 days in the LIA group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In our series patients treated with anesthetic blocks showed better results with similar control of postoperative pain. However, more studies would be needed.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement;Jenkins PJ;Bone Joint J,2013
2. Kurtz, Steven PhD1; Ong, Kevin PhD1; Lau, Edmund MS2; Mowat, Fionna PhD2; Halpern, Michael MPH, MD, PhD3. Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 89(4):p 780–785, April 2007. | DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
3. Fast-track knee arthroplasty – status and future challenges;Kehlet H;The Knee,2013
4. Kehlet H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. The Lancet. Vol. 381, issue 9878, 11–17 May 2013, pages 1600–1602.
5. Fast-track hip and knee replacement – what are the issues?;Kehlet H;Acta Orthopaedica,2010