Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical genetics and prenatal diagnosis, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City
2. Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
3. Department of Dermatology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with skeletal dysplasia (SD) from various perspectives.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA criteria. Searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, we identified studies describing ES, next-generation sequencing, and/or genes panel in fetuses with SD. Inclusion criteria were: (i) fetuses diagnosed with suspected SD by prenatal ultrasound; (ii) more than 5 fetuses included; (iii) normal karyotype and CMA results. Two reviewers completed the data of Prenatal (Ultrasound) phenotype and genotype information collection independently and merged it.
Results
We identified 18 studies with data on ES diagnostic yield including 599 individuals with SD. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found in 306 fetuses, resulting in a 60% (95% CI, 48–72%) diagnostic yield. The number of gene mutations detected was 346, involving 74 genes related to SD and 23.7% of novel variants. The targeted skeletal gene panel showed a diagnostic yield of 76% (95% CI, 62–89%).
Conclusions
The application of ES in fetuses with SD and normal karyotype or CMA can provide a considerable diagnostic yield. The benefits of using ES in selected groups will be more obvious.
Funder
Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Schramm T, Mommsen H. Fetal Skeletal Disorders. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980) 2018; 39: 610–634.
2. Advances in Skeletal Dysplasia Genetics;Geister KA;Annual review of genomics and human genetics,2015
3. A Retrospective Study of Cytogenetic Results From Amniotic Fluid in 5328 Fetuses With Abnormal Obstetric Sonographic Findings;Zhang S;Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,2017
4. Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis;Xia M;BMC pregnancy and childbirth,2020
5. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis;Wapner RJ;The New England journal of medicine,2012