Piloting a Community Health and Well-being Worker Model in Cornwall: a guide for implementation and spread

Author:

Tredinnick-Rowe John1,Byng Richard1,Brown Tamsyn2,Chapman Donna3

Affiliation:

1. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Plymouth

2. Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust

3. NHS Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Health Integrated Care Board

Abstract

Abstract Background This paper evaluates the introduction of ten Community Health and Well-being Workers (CHWW) in four pilot sites across Cornwall. The period evaluated was from the initial start in June 2022 until June 2023, covering the project setup and implementation across a range of Primary Care Networks (PCNs) and Voluntary sector partners (VSCO). Methods All ten CHWWs and their managers at each site were interviewed to understand the barriers and enablers to implementation and wider learning that could be captured around the project setup. Qualitative methods were used for data collection, including semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Transcripts were thematically analysed for cross-cutting themes, as well as site-specific effects. Results In terms of learning, we cover the following key areas, which were of most importance to the successful implementation of the pilot: The CHWW's were introduced into an already established, successful social prescribing (SP) system by the time the CHWW project began. CHWWs can access some of the same training and office space as SPs, with overlapping meeting schedules allowing them joint input on some topics. It seemed that all the pre-work in terms of relationships and learning about a similar role helped a rapid implementation. Each site's CHWW management structure uses the same line management as the SPs. Roles were clustered together to remove duplication, maximise coverage and triaging of residents. The largest barrier to overcome was integrating VSCO staff into NHS systems. Conversely, hosting CHWWs within an NHS organisation has pros and cons, namely better access to NHS data and staff, but longer lead-in time for registration on systems, and more bureaucracy for procurement/spend. Conclusions Looking to the future, the pilot’s success has spread the programme to the other integrated care areas in the country, with ongoing plans for further roll out and evaluation in the coming years.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference13 articles.

1. Bourdieu, Pierre. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge, Polity Press.

2. Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

3. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ2008;337:a165

4. Cox, T., Karanika-Murray, M., Griffiths, A., & Houdmont, J. (2007). Evaluating organisational-level work stress interventions: Beyond traditional methods Work & Stress, 21(4), 348–362.

5. Dallera. G, Antonacci. G, Junghens C, Harris M. (2022). Measuring the impact of the Community Health and Well-being Worker initiative in Westminster on immunisation, screening, NHS Health Check uptake, and GP consultation rates. Report commissioned by Westminster City Council. Oct 2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3