Affiliation:
1. The Qingdao University Medical College
2. Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College)
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Recently, many studies have shown that the progress of conversion therapy can provide surgical opportunities for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and bring survival benefits. However, the results of the current study show that the regimen used in conversion therapy is still controversial. Apatinib, as the standard third-line treatment for GC, has an inconclusive status in conversion therapy.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed GC patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to November 2019. All patients were pathologically diagnosed, had unresectable factors, and received SOX regimen with or without apatinib as conversion therapy.
Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Altogether 33 patients (66%) receivedconversion surgery and 17 patients (34%) received conversion therapy without surgery. The median progression-free survival (PFS) between surgery group and non-surgery group were 21.0 versus 4.0 months (p<0.0001), and the median overall survival (OS) were 29.0 versus 14.0 months (p<0.0001). In conversion surgery group, 16 patients (16/33) were treated with SOX plus apatinib, and the R0 resection rate was 81.3%; 17 patients (17/33) were treated with SOX regimen along, and the R0 resection rate was 41.2% (p=0.032). The PFS in the SOX combined with apatinib group was significantly longer than that of SOX group (25.5 versus 16 months, p=0.045), and the median OS were 34.0 versus 23.0 months (p=0.048). The addition of apatinib did not increase the incidence of serious adverse reactions throughout the preoperative therapy period.
Conclusions: Patients with advanced inoperable gastric cancer could benefit probably from conversion chemotherapy and subsequence conversion surgery. Apatinib targeted therapy combined with SOX chemotherapy may be a safe and feasible option for conversion therapy.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods;Ferlay J;International journal of cancer.,2019
2. Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Oda I, et al.Nashimoto A. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2018; 21:144–154. doi:10.1007/s10120-017-0716-7.
3. An JY, Ha TK, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. Proposal to subclassify stage IV gastric cancer into IVA, IVB, and IVM. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2009; 144:38–45; discussion 45. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.502.
4. Is conversion therapy possible in stage IV gastric cancer: the proposal of new biological categories of classification;Yoshida K;Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.,2016
5. Long-term survival and prognosis associated with conversion surgery in patients with metastatic gastric cancer;Einama T;Molecular and clinical oncology.,2017