The diagnostic performance of ultrasonic S-Detect technology in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-4 breast nodules smaller and larger than 20 mm

Author:

Xing Boyuan1,Gu Chen1,Fu Chenghui1,Zhang Bingyi1,Tan Yandi2

Affiliation:

1. Yichang Central People's Hospital, China Three Gorges University

2. Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background: We aimed to explore the value of ultrasonic S-Detect in the differential diagnosis of Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 breast nodules smaller and larger than 20 mm. Methods: Between November 2020 and November 2022, a total of 382 breast nodules in 312 patients were classified as BI-RADS-4 by conventional ultrasound. Using pathology results as the gold standard, we applied receiver operator characteristics (ROC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to analyze the diagnostic value of BI-RADS, S-Detect, and the two techniques in combination (Co-Detect) in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules smaller and larger than 20 mm. Results: There were 382 BI-RADS-4 nodules, of which 151 were pathologically confirmed as malignant, and 231 as benign. In lesions ≤ 20 mm, the SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, area under the curve (AUC) of the BI-RADS group were 77.27%, 89.73%, 85.71%, 78.16%, 89.25%, 0.835, respectively. SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, AUC of the S-Detect group were 95.05%, 78.92%, 83.15%, 67.50%, 95.42%, 0.855, respectively. SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, AUC of the Co-Detect group were 89.77%, 93.51%, 92.31%, 86.81%, 95.05%, 0.916, respectively. The difference of SE, ACC, NPV, AUC between the BI-RADS group and the Co-Detect group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In lesions > 20 mm, SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, AUC of the BI-RADS group were 88.99%, 89.13%, 88.99%, 91.80%, 85.42%, 0.890, respectively. SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, AUC of the S-Detect group were 98.41%, 69.57%, 86.24%, 81.58%, 96.97%, 0.840, respectively. SE, SP, ACC, PPV, NPV, AUC of the Co-Detect group were 98.41%, 91.30%, 95.41%, 93.94%, 97.67%, 0.949 respectively. The difference in AUC between the BI-RADS group and the Co-Detect group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: S-Detect combined with BI-RADS is highly effective in the differential diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules smaller and larger than 20 mm. However, being especially effective for lesions ≤ 20 mm, S-Detect combined with BI-RADS allows to reduce a number of unnecessary biopsies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference24 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3