Does the Metro System Change Urban Form? A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Taipei Metropolitan Area, Taiwan

Author:

Chiu Bing-yu1

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Abstract How does urban form change after investments in metro systems? Most of the new metro systems around the world currently under construction are in middle-income countries. As economic development is often a policy goal of transit investments, the urban form effects of earlier systems and their economic implications will be of interest for policy makers in these countries. Home to Taiwan’s first metro system that opened in 1996, Taipei can offer lessons on whether, how, and under what conditions its transit investments affect urban form. The objective of this study is to examine whether the introduction of new metro stations in the Taipei metropolitan area influenced urban form by concentrating both population and jobs to their proximity, and whether the duration of presence of metro stations is associated with the extent of such urban form effects. The urban form characteristics of interest were the population density and job density of a traffic analysis zone (TAZ). I used ArcGIS to identify TAZs within 800 meters from metro stations that opened at various times, and applied difference-in-differences, an econometric method of causal inference often used for policy evaluation, to analyze TAZ-level population and employment data from sources including the most recent 2000 and 2009 household travel surveys. Results show that newly introduced metro stations had no effects on the population density and job density of TAZs in their proximity. Although my findings neither confirm nor contribute to the existing knowledge about the relationship between transit investments and urban form, they sustain the academic quest for such relationship and advocate for policy change. Most importantly, they present evidence that the disconnect between transit investments and urban form changes should be remedied by intentional planning measures that facilitate transit-oriented development (TOD) to shape economically prosperous and environmentally sustainable compact cities.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J.: Mastering 'metrics: The path from cause to effect. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford (2015)

2. Cervero, R., Landis, J.: The transportation-land use connection still matters, vol. 7, pp. 2–10. Access (1995)

3. Cervero, R.: The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. 1st ed. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Chapter 1: Transit and the Metropolis: Finding Harmony. Chapter 15, Hierarchical Transit: Mexico City, Mexico. (1998)

4. Transit Service, Physical Agglomeration and Productivity in US Metropolitan Areas;Chatman D;Urban Stud.,2014

5. Daniels, T.L., Keller, J.W., Lapping, M.B., Daniels, K., Segedy, J.: The Small Town Planning Handbook, 3rd edn. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL (2007)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3