Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality between Myocardial Infarction with and without ST-segment Elevation in a Modern Context

Author:

Ma Honglan1,Xu Minmin1,Wu Sen1,Lu Xing1,Cao Jinlong1,Cai Tianzhi1

Affiliation:

1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) may have higher hospitalization cost and poorer prognosis than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to investigate the differences in cost and mortality between STEMI and NSTEMI. Methods A single center retrospective study was conducted on 1144 patients with 758 STEMI patients and 386 NSTEMI patients from January 1, 2020 to May 30, 2023. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 22, and mortality risk factors were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. Results STEMI patients had higher maximal troponin I(15222.5(27.18,40000.00) vs. 2731.5(10.73,27857.25), p <0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (56(53,59) vs. 57(55,59), p <0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. The clinical symptoms were mainly persistent or interrupted chest pain/distress either STEMI or NSTEMI patients. While the percentage of persistent chest pain/ chest distress was higher in the STEMI group than in the NSTEMI group (79.68% vs. 54.92%). STEMI patients had a significantly higher risk of combined hypotension than the NSTEMI group (8.97% vs. 3.89%, p = 0.002). And IABP was much more frequently used in STEMI group than in NSTEMI group with statistical difference(2.90% vs. 0.52%, P = 0.015). STEMI patients have higher hospitalization costs (31667(25337.79,39790) vs. 30506.905 (21405.96,40233.75), p = 0.006) and longer hospitalization days (10(8,11) vs. 9(8,11), p = 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. Even though STEMI patients had higher mortality at hospital compared to NSTEMI patients, there was no statistical difference (3.56% vs. 2.07%, p = 0.167). Systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP were risk factors for patient death (OR ≥ 1). Conclusions STEMI patients are more likely comorbid cardiogenic shock, heart failure complications with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospitalization days. And relatively more use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices such as IABP. Trial registration: The research was retrospectively registered in Chinese clinical trial registry on 22/11/2023(No. ChiCTR2300077885).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction;O'Gara PT;J Am Coll Cardiol,2013

2. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction management: great strides but still room for improvement;Grines CL;Eur Heart J,2021

3. Davis MG, Blankenship JC. PCI for late STEMI: Better late than never? Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 101. official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions; 2023. pp. 11–2.

4. Comparison of the cost in percutaneous coronary intervention between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction;Murakami T;Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2022

5. Reindl. Evolution of Myocardial Tissue Injury: A CMR Study Over a Decade After STEMI, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging;Mayr A,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3