The impacts of accreditation for medical schools: A scoping review

Author:

Girotto Leticia Cabrini1,Machado Karynne B.1,Moreira Roberta F. C.1,Martins Milton A.1,Tempski Patrícia Z.1

Affiliation:

1. University of São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify, systematically evaluate, and summarize information regarding the impact of the accreditation process on medical schools around the world. Method: Up to October 2021, researchers conducted a systematic review in databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus and ERIC, Cochrane Library, Grey Literature and Open Grey to identify studies that aimed to assess the impact of the accreditation process as perceived by stakeholders from medical schools. Two independent reviewers performed the selection process and extracted data from the included studies to perform a qualitative analysis. Results: This review identified 4,280 references, and 14 studies from six countries were included for data extraction. As an impact of the accreditation process, the studies highlighted the implementation of the information management system, reorganization of the school curriculum, restructuring of internal processes and the preparation process for receiving a second visit from evaluators after receiving feedback in the first visit. Continuous Quality Improvement was mentioned in eight studies as a positive impact of accreditation. Two studies discussed negative aspects, such as the accreditation agency not being specific to medical courses, dissatisfaction with the accreditation process, high financial and human resources demands, stress and a perception of the process as a “burden” for the school. Conclusion: The accreditation process has positive aspects (stakeholder satisfaction, student performance, changes in cultural organization and continuous quality improvement) and negative aspects (costs, time and staff effort and stress). The establishment of a dialogic accreditation process that is meaningful to the school could minimize negative aspects. Thus, the role of accreditation in improving the quality of medical education and, consequently, of the health care provided, could be affirmed. It is recommended that experiences with accreditation should be shared and reported to increase improvement in the quality of medical education worldwide.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3