Affiliation:
1. University of Buenos Aires
2. National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Abstract
Abstract
Great efforts have been sustained to explain the relationships between genotype and phenotype for developmental fitness traits through the study of their genetic architecture. However, crucial aspects of functional architecture influencing the maintenance of genetic variability, and thus the capacity for evolutionary change, are still unexplored.
Here we performed Genome-wide Association Studies for phenotypic variability, plasticity and within-line canalization at two temperatures for Larval Developmental Time (LDT), Pupal Developmental Time (PDT), Larval Viability (LV), Pupal Viability (PV), and Pupal Height (PH) in lines derived from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Results suggest changes in genetic networks linked to resource acquisition and allocation underlying variability for all traits. However, we found low genetic pleiotropy between traits and for different aspects of phenotype (means, plasticity, within-line canalization) within each trait. Their genetic bases were also temperature-specific: we found no variants showing an effect for the same trait at both temperatures. Moreover, a genetic decoupling between larval and pupal traits was confirmed, as there were no candidate variants significantly associated to phenotypic variability for the same trait across stages. We found evidence of genetic antagonistic pleiotropy for several loci affecting larval and pupal traits.
The high degree of modularity at various levels would allow for the independent evolution of distinct aspects of the phenotype in different environments and ontogenetic stages. This may explain why genetic variation for these adaptive traits is not extinguished in natural populations and may entail important implications regarding evolvability.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Temperature, growth rate, and body size in ectotherms: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle;Angilletta Jr MJ;Integrative and comparative biology,2004
2. Gene expression during the life cycle of;Arbeitman MN;Drosophila melanogaster Science,2002
3. Ayrinhac, A., Debat, V., Gibert, P., Kister, A. G., Legout, H., Moreteau, B., & David, J. R. (2004). Cold adaptation in geographical populations of Drosophila melanogaster: phenotypic plasticity is more important than genetic variability.Functional Ecology,700–706.
4. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight;Barker JSF;Ecology,1970
5. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing;Benjamini Y;Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological),1995