Functional and mortality outcomes with medical and surgical therapy in malignant posterior circulation infarcts: A systematic review

Author:

Lim Nicole-Ann1ORCID,Lin Hong-Yi1,Tan Choon Han2,Ho Andrew FW3,Yeo Tseng Tsai4,Nga Vincent5,Tan Benjamin YQ5,JR MervynORCID,Yeo Leonard LL5

Affiliation:

1. National University of Singapore Faculty of Medicine: National University Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine

2. LKCMedicine: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine

3. Duke-NUS: Duke-NUS Medical School

4. NUHS: National University Health System

5. NUH: National University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background There remains uncertainty regarding optimal definitive management for malignant posterior circulation infarcts (MPCI). While guidelines recommend neurosurgery for malignant cerebellar infarcts that are refractory to medical therapy, concerns exist about functional outcome and quality of life after decompressive surgery. Objective This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of surgical intervention compared to medical therapy in MPCI. Methods In this systematic review, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until 2nd April 2021. Studies were included if they involved posterior circulation strokes treated with neurosurgical intervention, and reported mortality and functional outcome data. Data were collected according to PRISMA guidelines. Results The search yielded 6,677 studies of which 31 studies (comprising 723 patients) were included for analysis. From the included studies, we found that surgical therapy led to significant differences in mortality and functional outcomes in patients with severe disease. Neurological decline and radiological criteria was often used to decide the timing for surgical intervention, as there is currently limited evidence for preventative neurosurgery. There is also limited evidence for the superiority of one surgical modality over another. Conclusion For patients with MPCI, in terms of mortality and functional outcome, surgical therapy appears to be equivocal to medical therapy, except in patients with severe disease. Reliable evidence is lacking and further prospective studies are rendered.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3