Affiliation:
1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
2. Maqin County Forestry and Grassland Station
3. Golog Tibtean Autonomous Prefecture Agriculture and animal husbandry comprehensive service center
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Caryophyllaceae contains 100 genera and 3000 species, many of which are valuable both ecologically and economically. However, as past research has shown, the fundamental phylogenetic relationships of Caryophyllaceae are still debatable, and molecular dating based on chloroplast genomes has not been thoroughly examined for the entire family.
Methods
In this study, we used four newly generated Caryophyllaceae chloroplast genomes and eighteen other published genomes to clarify their genetic properties.
Results
These 22 chloroplast genomes had typical quadripartite structure, with 129–134 distinct genes and lengths ranging from 133,621 bp to 153,957 bp. The 22 Caryophyllaceae chloroplast genomes showed significant variations in the number of long repeats and SSR types; mononucleotide repeats (A/T) and palindromic repeats were the most common types. Three substantially divergent areas containing atpB-rbcL, rbcL-accD, and accD were found by further comparative study, which could serve as effective molecular markers. The codon bias of chloroplast genomes in Caryophyllaceae were mainly affected by natural selection, but other factors such as mutation pressure could also affect the codon bias to some extent. Fourteen optimal codons were identified in the chloroplast genome of Caryophyllidae. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the monophyly of any of the three recognized subfamilies within Caryophyllaceae was not supported by our data. Meanwhile, seven well-supported clades correspond to 8 tribes were found in Phylogenetic trees. The results of molecular dating demonstrated that the divergence between Caryophyllaceae and Amaranthaceae was estimated to occur in 69 Ma. Tr. Paronychieae was the oldest tribe of the eight tribes included in this study, diverged at 59.92 Ma.
Conclusion
This study provides resources for further investigations on the identification, genetic engineering, evolution, and phylogeny of Caryophyllaceae species.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference80 articles.
1. Uotila P. A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales;Hernández-Ledesma P;Willdenowia,2015
2. Bittrich V. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich V, editors. Flowering Plants: Dicotyledons; Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid Families. Berlin: Springer; 1993. pp. 206–36.
3. Dequan L, Morton J. Flora of China. In: Wu Z, Raven PH, editors. Caryophyllaceae through Lardizabalaceae. St. Louis: Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden; 2001. pp. 1–113.
4. Nowicke JW, Caryophyllales. Evolution and Systematics. In: Behnke HD, Mabry JT, editors. Pollen Morphology and Exine Ultrastructure. Berlin: Springer; 1994. pp. 168–221.
5. Punt W, Hoen PP. Caryophyllaceae Rev Palaeobot Palyno. 1995;88:82–272.