How different attributes are weighted in professionals' decision-making in Pediatric Dentistry – a protocol for guiding discrete choice experiment focused on shortening the evidence-based practice implementation for dental care

Author:

Machado Gabriela Manco1,Luca Ana Clara Falabello1,Pereira Renata de Paz Leal1,Fernandez Ana Yne2,Rodrigues Lucas Gabriel Santini1,Leite Isabella Petroline1,Cenci Maximiliano Sergio3,Cenci Tatiana Pereira3,Santos Ana Paula Pires4,Vieira Branca Heloisa de Oliveira Martins4,Nadanovsky Paulo5,Lima Marina de Deus Moura6,Moura Marcoeli Silva6,Lucena Edson Hilan Gomes7,Lenzi Tathiane Larissa8,Crispim Ana Carla9,Carrer Fernanda Campos de Almeida1,Gabriel Mariana1,Lira Claudia Cazal10,Gurgel Carla Vecchione11,Pinheiro Helder Henrique Costa12,Junior Gilberto Alfredo Pucca13,Martins Fabio Carneiro13,Calvasina Paola Gondim14,Tricoli Maria Fernanda de Montezuma15,Branco Camila Menezes Costa Castelo15,Freitas Raiza Dias11,Imparato José Carlos Pettorossi1,Raggio Daniela Prócida1,Tedesco Tamara Kerber1,Mendes Fausto Medeiros1,Braga Mariana Minatel1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de São Paulo

2. Pontifícia Universidade Católica Madre y Maestra

3. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

4. Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro

5. Institute of Social Medicine

6. Federal University of Piauí

7. Federal University of Paraíba

8. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

9. Instituto Ayrton Senna

10. Federal University of Pernambuco

11. Federal University of Bahia

12. Federal University of Para

13. University of Brasília

14. State University of Ceará

15. Unified Health System

Abstract

Abstract Background Important evidence has been constantly produced and needs to be converted into practice. Professional consumption of such evidence may be a barrier to its implementation. Then, effective implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice leans on the understanding of how professionals value attributes when choosing between options for dental care, permitting to guide this implementation process by maximizing strengthens and minimizing barriers related to that. Methods This is part of a broader project investigating the potential of incorporating scientific evidence into clinical practice and public policy recommendations and guidelines, identifying strengths and barriers in such an implementation process. The present research protocol comprises a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) from the Brazilian oral health professionals' perspective, aiming to assess how different factors are associated with professional decision-making in dental care, including the role of scientific evidence. Different choice sets will be developed, either focusing on understanding the role of scientific evidence in the professional decision-making process or on understanding specific attributes associated with different interventions recently tested in randomized clinical trials and available as newly produced scientific evidence to be used in clinical practice. Discussion Translating research into practice usually requires time and effort. Shortening this process may be useful for faster incorporation into clinical practice and beneficial to the population. Understanding the context and professionals' decision-making preferences is crucial to designing more effective implementation and/or educational initiatives. Ultimately, we expect to design an efficient implementation strategy that overcomes threats and potential opportunities identified during the DCEs, creating a customized structure for dental professionals. Trial registration https://osf.io/bhncv

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3