I Have a Dream…Altering New Zealand Medical Students’ Interpretation Bias of Māori in Healthcare Using Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM)

Author:

Hsu Che-Wei1,Akuhata-Huntington Zaine1

Affiliation:

1. University of Otago

Abstract

Abstract Health inequity is commonly experienced by marginalized populations and is a risk factor for developing health problems. One major contributor to health inequity is implicit (unconscious) bias. Many existing bias trainings aim to shift individuals' stereotype beliefs and evaluations of marginalized groups (the ‘what’ training), which can be challenging as these beliefs and evaluations are intrinsic. Here, we developed and tested a novel digital bias training tool called cognitive bias modification for stereotype (CBM-S), a tool designed to address more malleable context-dependent thinking patterns (the how’ training). CBM-S uses an implicit learning task designed to force a less biased interpretation of situations involving Māori patients, an indigenous population of Aotearoa New Zealand. Using a pre-post training design, we tested the effectiveness of a single session 59-item CBM-S training session delivered via a web application against an active-reading control group. We adopted three implicit bias measures at pre- and post-test: two interpretation bias tests and one beliefs/evaluation assessment. Additionally, explicit bias measures were administered at post-test. Following CBM-S training, we found a reduction over time in stereotype interpretation bias scores with moderate practical significance (n2p= .11). Further analysis revealed a similar reduction in post-training stereotype bias scores after adjusting for baseline bias scores (n2p= .07). We found no significant differences in the beliefs/evaluation test scores or the explicit bias measures between the intervention and control groups but observed positive correlations between interpretation bias and explicit bias scores. Implications and potential applications are discussed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference175 articles.

1. Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing;Adesope OO;Review of Educational Research,2017

2. Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., Conrey, F. R., & Stroessner, S. J. (2009). Stereotype strength and.

3. attentional bias: preference for confirming versus disconfirming information depends.

4. on processing capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1081–1087.

5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.002.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3