Demographic and clinical characteristics impact the use of restrictive interventions in an adolescent inpatient unit. A retrospective cohort study.

Author:

Doyle Lesley1,Hochard Kevin D.1,Wadsworth Robynne1,Pender Fiona1,Watkin Anna1,Jaydeokar Sujeet1

Affiliation:

1. Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract In adolescents admitted to mental health inpatient units, restrictive interventions are associated with a risk of physical and psychological harm. Mental Health policy and legal frameworks advocate least restrictive options and there is a drive to reduce the use of restrictive interventions in inpatient units. There is insufficient evidence pertaining to the characteristics of UK adolescents who are at risk of experiencing restrictive interventions within general adolescent mental health units. This study aimed to determine whether demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with the use of restrictive interventions or with the type of restrictive interventions. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using routinely collected data from a general adolescent unit in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, UK, over a 2-year period (1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022). There were three key findings. Of the 122 adolescents admitted, 46(38%) experienced restrictive intervention. Characteristics associated with the increased use of restrictive interventions included diagnosis of behavioural and emotional disorders and being a child looked after by the local authority. Being male was significantly associated with seclusion and being a child looked after was significantly associated with the use of physical and chemical interventions. These findings have important implications for policy and practice; they highlight the need for careful consideration by professionals, as to whether the needs of adolescents with these particular attributes are indeed best met within an inpatient unit, or whether the risks of admission including the increased risk of restrictive intervention outweigh the potential benefits. Also, further consideration of the most appropriate strategies for reducing restrictive interventions when admissions are appropriate or unavoidable, is required.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Debate: The future of inpatient units – do we need them?;Cotgrove A;Child Adolesc Ment Health,2021

2. NHS England Care Quality Commission Health Education England Monitor Public Health England Trust Development Authority (2014) NHS Five Year Forward View. London, UK

3. NHS England (2019) The NHS Long Term Plan

4. NHS (2023) NHS Data Dictionary. https://www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/nhs_business_definitions/restrictive_intervention.html#:~:text=They are defined as%3A,no action is undertaken%3B and. Accessed 15 Jun 2023

5. Restrictive Practices in Adult Secure Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review;Lawrence D;Int J Forensic Ment Health,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3