An IoT Based Water Quality Classification Framework for Aqua-Ponds through Water and Environmental Variables using CGTFN Model-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An IoT Based Water Quality Classification Framework for Aqua-Ponds through Water and Environmental Variables using CGTFN Model

Published:2024-02-23 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

AREPALLI PEDA GOPI¹^ORCID,K Jairam Naik¹,Amgoth Jagan²

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Technology Raipur

2. Padmasri Dr BV Raju Institute of Technology

Abstract

Maintaining water quality in aquatic habitats is critical for the health of aquatic species, particularly for fish. This study pioneers an innovative method to water quality classification, leveraging IoT-driven data acquisition and meticulous data labelling with the Aqua-Enviro Index (AEI) by considering the fish habitats. Existing mechanisms fail to capture complex temporal dynamics and depend largely on large amounts of labelled data, exposing fundamental limits. In response, we describe the Deep learning based Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Tempo Fusion Network (CGTFN) model, which represents a considerable development in the evaluation of water quality. The model addresses these restrictions by seamlessly merging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial pattern recognition and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) for temporal interactions. The Tempo Fusion mechanism combines spatial, temporal, and contextual data harmoniously, allowing for more sophisticated classifications by recognizing subtle interdependencies among environmental elements. The pioneering CGTFN model outperforms previous models, achieving 99.71% and 99.81% accuracy on both public-env and real-time-env datasets, respectively, exceeding established models at 98.2%. These remarkable findings highlight CGTFN's disruptive potential in water quality evaluation, bridging the gap between technology and environmental management, with ramifications ranging from aquaculture to resource sustainability.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference4 articles.

1. Aghel B, Rezaei A, Mohadesi M (2019) Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:4823–4832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1896-3. Modeling and prediction of water quality parameters using a hybrid particle swarm optimization-neural fuzzy approach

2. Ahmed U, Mumtaz R, Anwar H, Shah AA, Irfan R, García-Nieto J Efficient water quality prediction using supervised machine learning. Water 11(11):2210 - DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112210 [3], Arepalli PG, Khetavath JN (2023). An IoT framework for quality analysis of aquatic water data using time-series convolutional neural network. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–20., Naik KJ (2023). A deep learning-enabled IoT framework for early hypoxia detection in aqua water using light weight spatially shared attention-LSTM network. The Journal of Supercomputing, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05580-x [5], Arepalli PG, Naik KJ (2023). An IoT based Smart Water Quality Assessment Framework for Aqua-Ponds Management using Dilated Spatial-Temporal Convolution Neural Network (DSTCNN). Aquacultural Engineering, 102373., [6]Arepalli PG, Naik KJ (2019) (2023). An IoT-based water contamination analysis for aquaculture using lightweight multi‐headed GRU model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(12), 1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12126-4 [7]Alonso, Á., Gómez-de-Prado, G., & Romero-Blanco, A. (2022). Behavioural Variables to Assess the Toxicity of Unionized Ammonia in Aquatic Snails: Integrating Movement and Feeding Parameters. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 82(3), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00920-z

3. Bisht AK, Singh R, Bhatt A, Bhutiani R (2017) Development of an automated water quality classification model for the River Ganga. In International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (pp. 190–198). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8657-1_15

4. Cao S, Zhou L, Zhang Z, A watershed water quality prediction model based on attention mechanism and Bi-LSTM (2021) Prediction of dissolved oxygen content in aquaculture based on clustering and improved ELM. IEEE Access, 9, 40372–40387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064029 [10]Zhang, Hongming, Online water quality monitoring based on UV–Vis spectrometry and artificial neural networks in a river confluence near Sherfield-on-Loddon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 194.9 (2022): 630. [11]Zhang, Qiang,. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29.50 (2022): 75664–75680. [12]Li, Wuyan, Prediction of dissolved oxygen in a fishery pond based on gated recurrent unit (GRU). Information Processing in Agriculture 8.1 (2021): 185–193. [13]El-Shebli, Marwa, Yousef Sharrab, and Dimah Al-Fraihat. Prediction and modeling of water quality using deep neural networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability (2023): 1–34. [14]Barzegar, Rahim, Mohammad Taghi Aalami, and Jan Adamowski. Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 34.2 (2020): 415–433. [15]Alvi, Maira, Deep learning in wastewater treatment: A critical review. Water Research (2023): 120518. [16]Nicholaus, Isack Thomas, Anomaly detection of water level using deep autoencoder. Sensors 21.19 (2021): 6679. [17]Baek, Sang-Soo, Jongcheol Pyo, and Jong Ahn Chun. Prediction of water level and water quality using a CNN-LSTM combined deep learning approach. Water 12.12 (2020): 3399. [18]Hu, Zhuhua, A water quality prediction method based on the deep LSTM network considering correlation in smart mariculture. Sensors 19.6 (2019): 1420. [19]Dilmi, Smail, and Mohamed Ladjal. A novel approach for water quality classification based on the integration of deep learning and feature extraction techniques. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 214 (2021): 104329. [20]Li, Lei, Water quality prediction based on recurrent neural network and improved evidence theory: a case study of Qiantang River, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (2019): 19879–19896. [21]Oga, Takahiro, River water quality estimation based on convolutional neural network. 2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE, 2018. [22]Zheng, Jing, Convolutional neural networks for water content classification and prediction with ground penetrating radar. IEEE Access 7 (2019): 185385–185392. [23]Data.gov.in. (2017, June 22). https://data.gov.in/catalog/water-quality-india-2013?filters%5Bfield_catalog_reference%5D=2914901&format=json&offset=0&limit=6&sort%5Bcreated%5D=desc. Accessed on 2021, May 5 [24]Jairam Naik K, Peda Gopi A, (2023, April), Water quality fish, Retrieved 1st April 2023, from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/apgopi/water-quality-fish. [25]CWC. Central Water Commission. Dataset on Aquatic Parameters. 2022. http://www.cwc.gov.in/water-quality-inforamtion [26]Tallar, R. Y., & Suen, J. P. (2016). Aquaculture Water Quality Index: a low-cost index to accelerate aquaculture development in Indonesia. Aquaculture international, 24(1), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9926-3 [27]Talukdar, S., Ahmed, S., Naikoo, M. W., Rahman, A., Mallik, S., Ningthoujam, S., … Ramana, G. V. (2023). Predicting lake water quality index with sensitivity-uncertainty analysis using deep learning algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, 136885. [28]FAO, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. [Online] 2020. Available from: https://www.fao.org/state-of-fisheries-aquaculture/2020/en [29]FAO, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022: Data Collection | Natural resources | Aquasat. [Online] 2022. Available from FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization, statistics [30]TNAU, The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. [Online] 2022. Available from http://www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/fishery [31]CPCB | Central Pollution Control Board. (2019, October 23). CPCB | Central Pollution Control Board; cpcb.nic.in. https://cpcb.nic.in/wqstandards/. Accessed on 2021, May 5