Physician Engagement in Reproductive Health Advocacy: Findings from a Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Leadership and Advocacy Program

Author:

Jones Heidi E.1,Manze Meredith1,Brakman Anita2,Kwan Amy1,Davies MiQuel2,Romero Diana1

Affiliation:

1. City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH)

2. Physicians for Reproductive Health

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Medical curricula include advocacy competencies, but how much physicians engage in advocacy and what enables this engagement is not well characterized. The authors assessed facilitators and barriers to advocacy identified by physician alumni of a reproductive health advocacy training program. Methods: The authors present secondary results from a mixed methods program evaluation from 2018-2020, using alumni data from a cross-sectional survey (n=231) and in-depth interviews (IDIs, n=36). The survey measured engagement in policy, media, professional organization, and medical education advocacy and the value placed on the community fostered by the program (eight questions, Cronbach’s alpha=0.81). The authors estimated the association of community value score with advocacy engagement using multivariable Poisson regression and analyzed IDI data inductively. Results: Over one third of alumni were highly engaged in legislative policy (n=90, 39%), professional organizations (n=98, 42%), or medical education (n=89, 39%), with fewer highly active in media-based advocacy (n=54, 23%) in the year prior to the survey. Survey and IDI data demonstrated that passion, sense of urgency, confidence in skills, and the program’s emphasis on different forms of advocacy facilitated engagement in advocacy, while insufficient time, safety concerns, and sense of effort redundancies were barriers. The program community was also an important facilitator, especially for “out loud” efforts and for those working in environments perceived as hostile to abortion care (e.g., alumni in hostile environments with high community value scores were 1.8 times [95% CI 1.3, 2.6] as likely to report medium/high levels of media advocacy compared to those with low scores after adjusting for age, gender, and clinical specialty). Conclusion: Physician advocacy training curricula should include both skills- and community-building and identify a full range of forms of advocacy. Community-building is especially important for physician advocacy for reproductive health services such as abortion care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference10 articles.

1. Training Physicians in Advocacy: Why It Matters;Aksel S;Obstet Gynecol,2017

2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Edcuation. ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency). Common Program Requirements. Published July 1, 2022. Accessed January 11., 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresidency_2022v3.pdf.

3. Formal Advocacy Curricula in Family Medicine Residencies: A CERA Survey of Program Directors;Coutinho AJ;Fam Med,2020

4. Public roles of US physicians: community participation, political involvement, and collective advocacy;Gruen RL;JAMA,2006

5. 19-60455 - Jackson Women’s Health Orgn, et Al v. Thomas Dobbs, et Al.(United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2020). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca5-19-60455/USCOURTS-ca5-19-60455-0.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3