The parallel development-type growth planning of socially institutional infrastructure and the transcendency of optimal growth planning

Author:

Sakaki Shungo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Tokyo University of Technology

Abstract

Abstract To what extent do infrastructure, public capital, and social institutions contribute to economic growth? Unlike private business capitals, these socially institutional infrastructures do not directly generate economic growth. However, liberal economic activity is not completely alone; it depends on wide-ranging external conditions. In other words, private business capitals can be more productive through the externalities produced by the socially institutional infrastructures. When planning for the problem of sustainable allocation of finite and scarce resources, how much should we spend on the socially institutional infrastructures, and to what extent will it be effective? This paper attempts to answer this question with a simulation model that uses Ramsey-type optimal growth planning as a benchmark and performs practical and sequentially adaptive decision-making. As a result, it is possible to draw the following conclusions regarding a growth plan that develops private business capital and socially institutional infrastructure in parallel. First, even in an economy with a low level of capital at the initial stage of planning, it is possible to reach a level of social welfare that exceeds the optimal growth planning in the steady state without developing Keynesian public utilities projects or relying on the introduction of foreign capital as a closed economy system model. In addition, the steady-state levels of capital and consumption are below the modified golden rule level, a long-term growth plan that achieves a more economical resource allocation plan for socially finite scarce resources. It is possible to confirm the sustainable growth process with the parallel development-type planning from the time-series transition of this development-type ratio and the savings rate, which shifts consistently from the beginning of the plan to the steady state. The capital turnover rate continues to improve over the optimal plan toward the stationary state. This fact indicates that the parallel development-type planning achieves an efficient economy. JEL codes: C63, D62, E27, O43

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. Day R H (1983) Adaptive Economics. In: Crosby R W (ed) Cities And Regions As Nonlinear Decision Systems. Routledge, New York, pp. 103–142

2. Deming W A (2018) The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. MIT Press, Cambridge

3. Emmanuel C R, Otley D T, Merchant K (1990) Accounting for Management Control 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London

4. Evans G W, McGough B (2020) Adaptive Learning in Macroeconomics. University of Oregon. https://pages.uoregon.edu/gevans/LearningMacroOxford_RedForm_4Sept2020.pdf

5. Iwai K (1994) Economic Growth Theory (in Japanese). In: Iwai K, Ito M (eds) Modern Economic Theory. The University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 265–324

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3