Can verbal autopsies be used on a national scale? Key findings and lessons from the South Africa National Cause-of-Death Validation Study.

Author:

Maqungo Monique1,Nannan Nadine1,Nojilana Beatrice1,Nichols Erin2,Morof Diane3,Cheyip Mireille4,Rao Chalapati5,Lombard Carl6,Price Jessica7,Kahn Kathleen7,Martin Lorna J8,Bezuidenhout Francois9,Laubscher Ria6,Kabudula Chodziwadziwa7,Glass Tracy1,Awotiwon Oluwatoyin1,Zinyakatira Nesbert10,Funani Noluntu1,Joubert Jané1,Bradshaw Debbie1,Groenewald Pamela1

Affiliation:

1. Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council

2. National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

3. Associate Director of Programs KwaZulu-Natal, Division of Global HIV & TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

4. Division of Global HIV/AIDS and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

5. Department of Global Health, Research School of Population Health College of Health & Medicine, The Australian National University

6. Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council

7. MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand

8. Division of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town

9. GeoSpace International, 290 Glenwood Road, Lynnwood Park

10. Health Impact Assessment Unit, Western Cape Department of Health

Abstract

Abstract Background The quality of cause of death (COD) statistics in South Africa has room for improvement. It is possible that supplementary use of verbal autopsy (VA) interviews for the deaths that occur outside of health facilities might be useful. This study describes the challenges and successes of collecting a national sample of VA interviews. Methods We recruited next of kin who registered deaths in 27 randomly sampled sub-districts across South Africa between September 2017 – April 2018. Trained fieldworkers (84) conducted face-to-face interviews using the WHO2016 verbal autopsy (VA) instrument. A team of physicians (51), trained in medical certification of cause of death and reading VAs, certified the underlying causes of death. Feasibility was assessed considering response rates, participation and quality of data. Cause specific-mortality fractions (CSMF) based on physician reviews and InterVA-5 automated software were compared with 2017 Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) data and assessed for plausibility against burden of disease estimates. Results Only 26% of the 36,976 total deaths registered in the sample area were identified during recruitment and 65% of the next of kin agreed to be contacted. A total of 5,375 VA were conducted (overall response rate of 55%) and 83% of physician reviewed VAs were judged to have good quality data for assigning underlying cause of death. Fifty-nine percent of the VAs occurred in the 27 sampled sub-districts, with the remainder ones coming from adjacent areas. Comparing the CSMFs, the physician reviewed VA identified 22.3% HIV/AIDS and InterVA-5 18.5% deaths, in line with burden of disease estimates, while Stats SA identified 4.9% HIV/AIDS deaths. Conclusions The study demonstrated feasibility of using VA on a national scale, but immense challenges in identifying and recruiting next of kin highlights the importance of formalising VAs within the country’s death notification system.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3