Affiliation:
1. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
2. University of Cape Town
3. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is a global interest in institutionalizing health technology assessment (HTA) as an approach for explicit healthcare priority-setting. Institutionalization of HTA refers to the process of conducting and utilizing HTA as a normative practice for guiding resource allocation decisions within the health system. In this study, we aimed to examine factors influencing institutionalization of HTA in Kenya.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative case study using document reviews and in-depth interviews with 30 participants involved in the HTA institutionalization process. We used a thematic approach to analyze the data.
Results
We found that institutionalization of HTA in Kenya was being supported by factors such as establishment of organizational structures for HTA; availability of legal frameworks and policies on HTA; increasing availability of awareness creation and capacity-building initiatives for HTA; policymakers’ interests in universal health coverage and optimal allocation of resources; technocrats’ interests in evidence-based processes; presence of international collaboration for HTA; and lastly, involvement of bilateral agencies. On the other hand, institutionalization of HTA was being undermined by limited availability of skilled human resources, financial resources, and information resources for HTA; lack of HTA guidelines and decision-making frameworks; limited HTA awareness among subnational stakeholders; and industries’ interests in safeguarding their revenue.
Conclusions
Kenya’s Ministry of Health can facilitate institutionalization of HTA by adopting a systemic approach that involves: - a) introducing long-term capacity-building initiatives to strengthen human and technical capacity for HTA; b) earmarking national health budgets to ensure adequate financial resources for HTA; c) introducing a cost database and promoting timely data collection to ensure availability of data for HTA; d) developing context specific HTA guidelines and decision-making frameworks to facilitate HTA processes; e) conducting deeper advocacy to strengthen HTA awareness among subnational stakeholders; and f) managing stakeholders’ interests to minimize opposition to institutionalization of HTA.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage;Chalkidou K;Bull World Health Organ,2016
2. World Health Organization. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Final report of the WHO consultative group on equity and universal health coverage. In. Geneva, Switzerland; 2014.
3. The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration;O'Rourke B;Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2020
4. World Health Assembly. Sixtieth World Health Assembly- WHA 60.29. Health Technologies. In. Geneva. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
5. The elusive challenge of priority setting in health and health care;Norheim OF;Global Challenges,2017