An evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) competency profile for the Brazilian Health System developed through consensus: process and outcomes

Author:

Barreto Jorge Otávio Maia1ORCID,Romão Davi Mamblona Marques2,Setti Cecília2,Machado Maria Lúcia Teixeira3,Riera Rachel4,Gomes Romeu5,Machado Daienne Amaral6,Abreu João7,de Andrade Keitty Regina Cordeiro8,Boeira Laura dos Santos2,Pozza Letícia9,Souza Nathan Mendes10,Logullo Patrícia11,Silva Roberta Borges12,de Oliveira Sandra Maria do Valle Leone13,Mota Sara Emanuela de Carvalho8,Dias Tamille Sales14,Toma Tereza Setsuko15,Silva Silvio Fernandes da16

Affiliation:

1. Syrian-Lebanese Hospital: Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

2. Veredas Institute, São Paulo

3. Hospital Sirio-Libanes; Universidade Federal de São Carlos

4. Hospital Sírio-Libanes; Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo

5. Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo; Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro

6. Companhia de Planejamento do Distrito Federal, Brasília

7. Impulso Gov, São Paulo

8. Ministry of Health, Brasília

9. ODD Studio

10. Federal University of Minas , Belo Horizonte

11. Center for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Departament of Orthopaedics, Reumathology and Musculoeskeletal Diseases (NDORMS), and UK EQUATOR Center, University of Oxford

12. Ministry of Health

13. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Campo Grande

14. National School of Public Administration: Escola Nacional de Administracao Publica, Brasília

15. Health Institute of São Paulo, São Paulo

16. Syrian-Lebanese Hospital: Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract Background: Evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational knowledge, skills and attitudes that should be articulated with background factors and needs. In this regard, the development of an EIPM competency profile is important to support the diagnosis, planning and implementation of EIPM. Purpose: To present the process and outcomes of the development of an EIPM competency profile by an expert committee, to be applied in different contexts of the Brazilian Health System. Methods: A committee of experts in EIPM shared different views, experiences and opinions to develop an EIPM competency profile for Brazil. In six consensus workshops mediated by facilitators, the committee defined from macro problems to key actions and performances essential for the competency profile. The development steps consisted of: 1) Constitution of the committee, including researchers, professionals with practical experience, managers, and educators; 2) Development of a rapid review on EIPM competency profiles; 3) Agreement on commitments and responsibilities in the processes; 4) Identification and definition of macro problems relating to the scope of the competency profile; and 5) Outlining of general and specific capacities, to be incorporated into the competency profile, categorized by key actions. Results: The development of the EIPM competency profile was guided by the following macro problems: 1) lack of systematic and transparent decision-making processes in health policy management; 2) underdeveloped institutional capacity for knowledge management and translation; and 3) incipient use of scientific evidence in the formulation and implementation of health policies. A general framework of key actions and performances of the EIPM Competency Profile for Brazil was developed, including 42 specific and general key actions distributed by area of activity (Health Management, Scientific Research, Civil Society, Knowledge Translation, and Cross-sectional areas). Final considerations: The competency profile presented in this article can be used in different contexts as a key tool for the institutionalization of EIPM.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is Evidence-Informed Policymaking?;Oxman AD;Health Res Policy Sys,2009

2. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development;Lavis JN;PLoS Med,2012

3. World Health Organization. Evidence, policy, impact. WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization. ; 2021. Available on: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/350994/9789240039872-eng.pdf. [Cited in 2021 Jul 30].

4. Defining knowledge translation;Straus SE;CMAJ,2009

5. Lessons learned from descriptions and evaluations of knowledge translation platforms supporting Evidence-Informed Policymaking-making in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review;Partridge ACR;Health Res Policy Sys,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3