Assessing resilience at different scales: from single assets to complex systems

Author:

Fuggini Clemente1,Solari Celina1,De Stefano Rita1,Bolletta Fabio1,De Maio Florencia Victoria1

Affiliation:

1. Rina Consulting S.p.A.

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, Critical Infrastructure and Systems are getting more and more interconnected, while facing increasing and more intensive hazards: from man-made to natural ones, including those exacerbated by effects of the climate change. The demand for their robustness and resiliency against all these threats is finding ground to organizations or states’ ambitions, implementations, and policies. Moreover, their distributed network spanning from local areas to cities, from regions to cross-country extension, make them a target for malicious actions aimed to damage or even disrupt their critical supplied and therefore the availability of the service they deliver. The paper focuses on a review from an engineering perspective of past efforts (namely those related to the H2020 SecureGas project) and provides evidence of application cases where the network/system dimension of the critical infrastructure is a key point to be considered and to be safeguarded. Finally, an outlook on future perspectives and potentials in the application of resilience at local, urban, and territorial/national level is described, with a with on incoming and emerging threats at local and global level.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Agrafioti E, Chalkidoy A, Papadakis G, Gazi A, Gkotsi I, Stritecku V, et al. (2021) The SecureGas Key Performance Indicators. In: Soldatos J, Praça I, Jovanovic A, editors. Cyber-Physical Threat Intelligence for Critical Infrastructures Security: Securing Critical Infrastructures in Air Transport, Water, Gas, Healthcare, Finance, and Industry. Now Publishers Inc, Boston-Delft, pp. 342–360

2. Basso P, Osmani S, Scolari M, Valsecchi R (2021) A seismic risk assessment framework for loss estimation of critical infrastructure–hospitals case. 8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1: pp. 2643–2658.

3. Blagojevic N, Didier M, Hefti F, Henken J, Stojadinovic B (2022) Quantifying disaster resilience of a community with interdependent civil infrastructure systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.

4. Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience;Cantelmi R;Environment Systems and Decisions.,2021

5. Deshkar S, Adane V (2016) Community Resilience Approach for Prioritizing Infrastructure Development in Urban Areas. Urban Disasters and Resilience in Asia. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802169-9.00016-1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3