Allocation concealment appraisal of clinical therapy trials using the extended Composite Quality Score (CQS-2) – An empirically based update (Preprint)

Author:

Mickenautsch Steffen1ORCID,Yengopal Veerasamy2

Affiliation:

1. Review Centre for Health Science Research

2. University of the Western Cape

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To revise CQS-2/Criterion II concerning allocation concealment appraisal for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials. Methods Meta-analyses of trials with inadequate allocation concealment were tested for in-between trial heterogeneity (I2 > 0) due to imbalances in baseline variables. Meta-analyses with positive test results were used as a basis to deduce criteria for adequate allocation concealment. The CQS-2/Criterion II was reformulated in line with the findings. Result One suitable meta-analysis was identified. Two forest plots with data from five and four trials with inadequate/unclear allocation concealment were selected for testing. In addition, a total of five trials with adequate allocation concealment were identified. The meta-analysis test results were positive, and keywords for the judgment of adequate allocation concealment were extracted verbatim from the text of the meta-analysis. The extracted keywords indicate ‘central allocation’ as the main criterion for adequate allocation concealment. Criterion II of the CQS-2 was revised accordingly. Conclusion Criterion II of the CQS-2 trial appraisal tool was revised. The revised appraisal tool was specified as version CQS-2B.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials;Sterne JAC;BMJ,2019

2. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application;Minozzi S;J Clin Epidemiol,2020

3. World Health Organization. Number of clinical trial registrations by location, disease, phase of development, age and sex of trial participants (1999–2021). Website: https://www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/number-of-trial-registrations-by-year-location-disease-and-phase-of-development 2022 (accessed: January 16, 2023).

4. Is the Deductive Falsification Approach a Better Basis for Clinical Trial Appraisal?;Mickenautsch S;Rev Recent Clin Trials,2019

5. Extension of the Composite Quality Score (CQS) as an appraisal tool for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials-A systematic review of meta-epidemiological evidence;Mickenautsch S;PLoS One,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3