Affiliation:
1. Review Centre for Health Science Research
2. University of the Western Cape
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To revise CQS-2/Criterion II concerning allocation concealment appraisal for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials.
Methods
Meta-analyses of trials with inadequate allocation concealment were tested for in-between trial heterogeneity (I2 > 0) due to imbalances in baseline variables. Meta-analyses with positive test results were used as a basis to deduce criteria for adequate allocation concealment. The CQS-2/Criterion II was reformulated in line with the findings.
Result
One suitable meta-analysis was identified. Two forest plots with data from five and four trials with inadequate/unclear allocation concealment were selected for testing. In addition, a total of five trials with adequate allocation concealment were identified. The meta-analysis test results were positive, and keywords for the judgment of adequate allocation concealment were extracted verbatim from the text of the meta-analysis. The extracted keywords indicate ‘central allocation’ as the main criterion for adequate allocation concealment. Criterion II of the CQS-2 was revised accordingly.
Conclusion
Criterion II of the CQS-2 trial appraisal tool was revised. The revised appraisal tool was specified as version CQS-2B.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials;Sterne JAC;BMJ,2019
2. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application;Minozzi S;J Clin Epidemiol,2020
3. World Health Organization. Number of clinical trial registrations by location, disease, phase of development, age and sex of trial participants (1999–2021). Website: https://www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/number-of-trial-registrations-by-year-location-disease-and-phase-of-development 2022 (accessed: January 16, 2023).
4. Is the Deductive Falsification Approach a Better Basis for Clinical Trial Appraisal?;Mickenautsch S;Rev Recent Clin Trials,2019
5. Extension of the Composite Quality Score (CQS) as an appraisal tool for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials-A systematic review of meta-epidemiological evidence;Mickenautsch S;PLoS One,2022