Comparison of Microbiological Loads of Enteral Products Applied in Room Temperature and Intensive Care Conditions

Author:

ılıman alev yıldızORCID,YURTTAŞ Merve,ERGÜL Dursun Fırat,TUTKAOĞLU Salim

Abstract

Abstract

Background Despite the high risk of bacterial contamination, no studies have been found that evaluate the optimal hanging time of open system enteral sets under room temperature and intensive care conditions. This study aims to determine the differences in microbial loads of solutions taken from open system enteral feeding sets hanging for 24 hours under room temperature and intensive care conditions. Methods This study is a descriptive type of research. The study sample consisted of a total of 40 samples, with 20 samples under room temperature and 20 samples under intensive care conditions. A simple random sampling method was used for sample selection. The assessment of microbial quality was based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) online Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Results In this study, it was determined that 5% of the samples taken from intensive care and 15% of the samples taken at room temperature exceeded the accepted limit for aerobic mesophilic bacteria count. The count of catalase and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. was 5% in intensive care samples and 40% in room temperature samples. The total coliform count was not detected in intensive care samples but was 35% in room temperature samples. E. coli was not detected in either group. Conclusion Differences in microbial loads were observed when commercial enteral solutions were administered using open system enteral feeding sets under room and intensive care conditions for 24 hours. Therefore, large-scale studies are needed to determine the safe use of open system enteral feeding sets under room temperature conditions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. Enteral nutrition overview;Doley J;Nutrients,2022

2. Comparison of micronutrients in adult enteral formulas widely used in clinical practice;Yang H;Food Sci Nutr,2023

3. Comparison of Microbial Growth Between Commercial Formula and Blenderized Food for Tube Feeding;Johnson TW;Nutr Clin Pract,2019

4. Lyman B, Williams M, Sollazzo J, Hayden A, Hensley P, Dai H et al (2016) Enter Feeding Set Handling Techniques Nutr Clin Pract 32(2):193–200

5. Closed versus open enteral delivery systems: a quality improvement study;Vanek VW;Nutr Clin Pract,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3