Efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy on pain intensity and disability of older people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a protocol for a network meta-analysis

Author:

Fonseca Letícia Soares1ORCID,Silva Juliana1,Souza Mateus1,Mascarenhas Rodrigo1,Silva Hytalo1,Campos Mariana1,Pereira Leani2,Oliveira Murilo1,Oliveira Vinicius1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri

2. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to investigate the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy on pain intensity and disability of older people with chronic nonspecific low back pain, providing comprehensive evidence for an informed decision making. Methods We will perform a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for older people with chronic nonspecific low back pain. MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, EMBASE, AMED, PSYCINFO and PEDRO will be searched without language or date restrictions. Our primary outcomes are pain intensity and disability. Risk of bias will be assessed for all studies using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool 2.0. For each pairwise comparison between the different interventions, estimated mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals will be presented. Standard pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using random effects models in STATA version 16. The competing interventions will be ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the outcomes of interest at short- and long-terms. The confidence in the results from NMA will be assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. Discussion This NMA compares efficacy of interventions for nonspecific chronic low back pain in older people. It will provide reliable evidence for patients, clinicians, stakeholders and researchers in this field where competing therapies, many of extraordinarily little value, are commonly used in clinical practice. Systematic review registration: OSF (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4W6R5) and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022312565).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2006;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-S300.

2. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies;Dionne CE;Spine,2008

3. Non-specific low back pain;Maher C;Lancet,2017

4. Non-specific low back pain;Balagué F;Lancet,2012

5. Prevalence of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Its Associated Factors among Middle-Aged and Elderly People: An Analysis Based on Data from a Musculoskeletal Examination in Japan;Iizuka Y;Asian Spine J,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3