Incidence of suboptimal femoral component sizing in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and comparisons for patient-reported outcomes with the optimal group: A retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

Author:

Chang Wen-Shuo1,Chen Kuan-Ting1,Ho Chung-Han1,Wu Tsung-Mu1,Huang Chien-Cheng1,Chien Chi-Sheng1

Affiliation:

1. Chi Mei Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background: The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA) is a reliable surgical procedure for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. However, in Taiwan, the incidence and patient-reported outcomes in suboptimal femoral component sizing remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to clarify these issues. Methods: We identified all patients receiving OUKA in a Taiwan medical center between May 1, 2018, and August 31, 2021, for this study. Age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) functional activity score, and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and numeric rating scale (NRS) were included. Optimal and suboptimal groups were classified based on the posterior fit of the femoral component on postoperative lateral radiography. Outcome comparisons were performed between the two groups after following up. Results: Ninety-two patients (111 knees) were included in the study, including 79 (71.2%) knees in the optimal group and 32 (28.8%) knees in the suboptimal group. The median age was 68 years and 67 years, and the percentage of the male sex was 17.7% and 37.5% in the optimal and suboptimal groups, respectively. Compared with the suboptimal group, there was a greater improvement in KSS functional activity score in the optimal group; however, the difference was not significant (40 vs. 34, p = 0.154). Nonsignificant differences were also found between the two groups in the postoperative KSS functional activity score and the postoperative NRS and ROM. Conclusions: This study delineated the incidence and patient-reported outcomes in suboptimal femoral component sizing after OUKA in Taiwan, which provides an important reference for clinicians. Further studies, including more patients, are needed for validation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3