Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis: a network meta-analysis

Author:

Wan Yuanyuan1,Zeng Qinghai1,Jiang Ling1,Fu Chuhan1,Mao Shunmin1,Zhang Lan1,Zhang Yushan1,Zhang Xiaolin1,Zhu Lu1,Zhang Fan1,Chen Jing1,Lei Li1

Affiliation:

1. Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK), and uses different light sources as well as photosensitizers. In addition, PDT is often combined with other physical therapies or drugs. A network meta-analysis (NMA) allows for comparison between treatments not directly compared in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study’s objective was to compare the efficacy of different PDTs against AK lesions based on complete response rate (CR) by conducting a NMA. Methods: The RCTs on the treatment of AK using PDT were screened, and a Bayesian model was developed using GeMTC 0.14.3 software to perform a NMA. The subgroups demarcated on the basis of the light sources and photosensitizers were also compared. RevMan 5.4.0 software was used to compare the outcome measure of different light sources in terms of relative risk ratio (RR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). The therapeutic effects of different photosensitizers were compared using R 4.2.1 software and gemtc package version 1.0-1. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool in RevMan 5.4.0, and the network plots between studies were drawn using STATA 16.0 software. Results: Twenty-six trials involving 2285 patients and 14 treatments were included in the NMA. The results of the NMA showed that ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted methyl 5-aminolevulinic acid (MAL)-light-emitting diode (LED)-PDT had the best possible efficacy (Rank 1=0.56), followed by calcipotriol (CAL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT (Rank 1=0.34) and 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA)-LED-PDT (Rank 1=0.05). The subgroup analysis showed that MAL-based PDT had better efficacy when using LED versus other light sources (RR:1.05,95% CI:1.03-1.07), and LED-based PDT resulted in the best possible efficacy when using ALA (Rank 1=0.47) versus other photosensitizers. Conclusions: AFL combined with MAL-LED-PDT is most likely the best treatment option for AK. In case of monotherapies, PDT based on LED light source and ALA photosensitizer is a suitable choice.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Comparison of the Treatment Guidelines for Actinic Keratosis: A Critical Appraisal and Review;Fleming P;J Cutan Med Surg,2017

2. A network meta-analysis of the relative efficacy of treatments for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp in Europe;Vegter S;PLoS ONE,2014

3. Photodynamic therapy - mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations;Kwiatkowski S;Biomed Pharmacother,2018

4. Review of Dermatology Use of 5-aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy;Wang P;China Med Abstractof Dermatology,2015

5. The conventional protocol vs. a protocol including illumination with a fabric-based biophotonic device (the Phosistos protocol) in photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical study;Mordon S;Br J Dermatol,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3