Cefoxitin versus Cefepime for the Prevention of Perioperative Infection in Elderly Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Author:

Liu Yangxi1,Luo Yang1,Xu Jing1,Zhang Zaili1,Shi Bisheng1,Ni Xiaojun1

Affiliation:

1. Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing perioperative infection in patients aged 70 who underwent colorectal cancer surgery of are unknown. We conducted a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of cefoxitin and cefepime in preventing perioperative infections and assessed the inflammatory response to antibiotics during the perioperative period. Methods Patients over 70 years old and undergo surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2021 and June 2022 at the same ward of a tertiary teaching hospital in Shanghai, China were included. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from hospital information system (HIS) to evaluate the body reaction of two antibiotic prophylaxis: patients in Group A received cefoxitin and in Group B accepted cefepime after surgery. Both antibiotics were intravenous 2000mg, two times daily, total 3 days. The effect of perioperative prevention was compared between two groups with any infection complications, hospital length of stay (HLOS), postoperative length of stay (POLS) and mortality during hospitalization. Results A total of 107 elderly patients (56 patients in Group A and 51 patients in Group B) with colorectal cancer were included. Two groups were similar in terms of tumor stage and other basic demographic. Patients received cefoxitin demonstrated lower infection complications (12.5% vs 13.7%, P = 0.851), among which surgical site infection (SSI) were most frequent complications in both groups (8.5% vs 9.8%, P = 0.877). However, patients with cefepime represented shorter HLOS (14.0 ± 4.7 days vs 13.9 ± 3.8 days, P = 0.912) and PLOS (9.4 ± 3.8 days vs 8.4 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.265). Additionally, the percentage of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 + cell was significantly higher (29.2%±9.2 vs 46.5%±10.0, P = 0.001) and the percentage of CD8 + cell was statistical lower (26.1% [23.1, 34.4] vs 19.2% [15.5, 20.4], P = 0.004) in Group B compared to Group A at the third postoperative day. No death occurred in both groups. Conclusion Cefepime and cefoxitin both serve as useful prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications among elder patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. However, cefepime illustrated a more active inflammatory response and might enhance the body recovery in early post-operative rehabilitation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA surgery 2017, 152(8):784–791.

2. Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery;Ho VP;Surg Infect,2011

3. Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection;Wang Q;J evidence-based Med,2023

4. Choice of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery does matter;Deierhoi RJ;J Am Coll Surg,2013

5. Cause of death for elders with colorectal cancer: a real-world data analysis;Wang R;J Gastrointest Oncol,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3