Affiliation:
1. Medical University of South Carolina - College of Health Professions
2. New York University
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Using eye-tracking, we assessed the receptive verb vocabularies of late talkers and typically developing children (Experiment 1) and autistic preschoolers (Experiment 2). We evaluated how many verbs participants knew and how quickly they processed the linguistic prompt.
Method
Participants previewed two dynamic scenes side-by-side (e.g., “stretching” and “clapping”) and were then prompted to find the target verb. Children’s eye gaze behaviors were operationalized using established approaches in the field with modifications in consideration for the type of stimuli (dynamic scenes versus static images) and the populations included. Accuracy was calculated as a proportion of time spent looking to the target, and linguistic processing was operationalized as latency of children’s first look to the target.
Results
In Experiment 1, there were no group differences in the proportion of verbs known, but late talkers required longer to demonstrate their knowledge than typically developing children. Latency was predicted by age but not language abilities. In Experiment 2, autistic children’s accuracy and latency were both predicted by receptive language abilities.
Conclusion
Eye gaze can be used to assess receptive verb vocabulary in a variety of populations, but in operationalizing gaze behavior, we must account for between- and within-group differences. Bootstrapped cluster-permutation analysis is one way to create individualized measures of children’s gaze behavior, but more research is warranted using an individual differences approach with this type of analysis. Finally, latency may not be a valid measure for dynamic scene stimuli for children under three years old.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Cauley KM, Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K, Gordon L. Revealing hidden competencies: a new method for studying language comprehension in children with motor impairments. American journal on mental retardation.1989 Jul. 94(1),53–63.
2. Lampe R, Turova V, Blumenstein T, Alves-Pinto A. Eye movement during reading in young adults with cerebral palsy measured with eye tracking. Postgraduate Medicine. 2014 Sep 1;126(5):146 – 58. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2014.09.2809
3. Brady NC, Anderson CJ, Hahn LJ, Obermeier SM, Kapa LL. Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2014 Jun 1;30(2):147 – 59. http://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.904923
4. Individual differences in the real-time comprehension of children with ASD;Venker CE;Autism Res
5. An open conversation on using eye-gaze methods in studies of neurodevelopmental disorders;Venker CE;J Speech Lang Hear Res