Evaluating and comparing critical thinking skills of specialty residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Author:

Mehrpour Saeed Reza1,Shavoun Amin Hoseini1,Kheiltash Azita1,Masoomi Rasoul1,Seraji Roya Nasle1

Affiliation:

1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Today’s complexities and diversity in the clinical setting have revealed the need to pay attention to strengthening critical thinking skills. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare critical thinking skills in the specialty residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Methods The present study is a descriptive and cross-sectional type of study. The statistical population of the study included 284 specialty residents in orthopedic, internal medicine, and surgery groups studying in the first to fourth years of residency. They were selected by a census method. A two-section questionnaire, including demographic characteristics and the California Critical Thinking Skills Test -Form B (CCTST-B), was used to collect data. The collected data were entered into SPSS-16 software and analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential (one-way ANOVA) statistics. The significant level in all tests was considered at P < 0.05. Results The mean critical thinking skill score of specialty residents (SD = 3.52, M = 13.81) was found at a level lower than the optimal level. A significant difference was found between the critical thinking skill scores in the three groups (internal medicine, surgery, and orthopedic). Comparing the mean critical thinking skill scores of the specialty residents separately for residency year revealed a significant difference between critical thinking skill scores in the four groups. Conclusion The critical thinking skills of the specialty residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were generally below the optimal level. The critical thinking score of the residents increased in the second year, but it was reduced again in the third and fourth years. Due to the emphasis of accreditation institutions, the World Federation for Medical Education, and other international institutions on the promotion of critical thinking, it is recommended to pay more attention to the factors related to the promotion and development of critical thinking skills in specialty residents.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. The need for change in medical sciences education: A step towards developing critical thinking;Hasanpour M;Iran Journal of Nursing,2006

2. Clinically oriented physiology teaching: a strategy for developing critical-thinking skills in undergraduate medical students;Abraham RR;Advances in Physiology Education,2004

3. Tyreman, S., Promoting critical thinking in health care: Phronesis and criticality. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2000. 3(2): p. 117–124.

4. Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education;Mangena A;Nurse Education Today,2005

5. Implementation and evaluation of critical thinking strategies to enhance critical thinking skills in Middle Eastern nurses;Simpson E;International journal of nursing practice,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3