Context explains much of patient-perceived physician empathy in general practice

Author:

Lelorain Sophie1,Descamps Axel2,Grignoli Nicola3,Pruvost Thomas4,Dhelft Antoine4,Rouhier Marie-Anne2,Lallemant Elise2,Sebbah Alissa2,Pinçon Claire4

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne, Department of Psychology, Research Center in Health, Aging and Sport psychology

2. Department of general practice, University of Lille

3. Cantonal Sociopsychiatric Organisation, Public Health Division, Department of Health and Social Care, Repubblica e Cantone Ticino, Mendrisio

4. Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR2694 (METRICS : évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales)

Abstract

Abstract Background. Patient-perceived physician empathy (PPPE) is associated with numerous positive outcomes for patients, quality of care and health expenditure. Research into the factors that explain PPPE is therefore crucial, but the focus has often been placed on physician-related predictors of PPPE. In general practice, however, many barriers to empathy may be contextual, such as lack of time, or patient-related, such as multimorbidity. Consequently, our aim was to explore the effect of these variables on PPPE in general practice. Methods. In a cross-sectional design, 50 randomly recruited physicians were compelled to include 20 consecutive adult patients with one or more chronic disease(s). The characteristics of the doctors and their work environment were collected (e.g. gender, age, peer-group participation or lack of participation, urban or rural area, working alone or with other colleagues, caseload, etc.). Physicians filled in patients’ diseases, and patients filled in validated questionnaires on their health, emotional skills (i.e their ability to identify, express and regulate emotions) and their perception of physician empathy (CARE scale). Multilevel linear regressions were performed using SAS. Results. The median PPPE was 45 (n = 762), with higher rates in patients who had had seven or more consultations with the physicians in the last 12 months and lower in patients with genitourinary and upper gastrointestinal diseases. In consultations ≤ 20 minutes, the length of consultation was associated with higher PPPE in interaction with patients’ emotional skills: the positive effect of longer consultations on PPPE was stronger in patients with low emotional skills, whereas patients with high emotional skills were able to perceive high empathy even in very short consultations of 5–10 minutes. Among the 11 physician-related candidate variables, only physician age had a significant effect. Conclusions. Patient-related and, especially, contextual variables explained PPPE much more than physician-related variables. Consultations with infrequently seen patients and patients with low emotional skills should ideally last at least 20 minutes to allow the empathic process to unfold. Patients with genitourinary and upper-gastrointestinal diseases should be given special consideration, as they may encounter intimate issues or specific needs requiring more attention.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3