Affiliation:
1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
2. Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University
3. Qujing City Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Estrogen and Progesterone receptors(ER, PR) are essential indicators for Breast cancer(BC) therapy, but the unbalanced expression effect remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the features of HER2-negative BC with different expressions of ER and PR.
Methods: 106,742 women patients with BC in SEER from 2010 to 2015 were divided into four groups: ER-negativePR-negative (NN), ER-negativePR-positive (NP), ER-positvePR-negative (PN), ER-positivePR-positive (PP). The significant results of Cox Hazard regression were used to build the nomograms of NP and PN.
Results: Groups of ER-negative (median age<60) were younger than ER-positive. Proportions about Grade III-IV of NP and NN were significantly higher than PN and PP (III: 81.41%, 81.71%, 44.26%, 18.63%; IV: 0.73%, 0.61%, 0.29%, 0.10%). Metastasis rates in NN, NP, and PN were higher than in PP (3.45%,3.02%,3.26%, 2.07%). The survival line of NP was equal to NN (P=0.65) but lower than PP (P=0.00011); PN was lower than PP but significantly higher than NN(P<0.0001). C-index of NP and PN prediction models was 0.721 (95%CI: 0.679-0.761) and 0.750 (95%CI: 0.736-0.763).
Conclusion: HER2-negative BC with uneven expressions of ER and PR differs from those with consistent presentations. NP and NN have similar clinical features: worse grading, larger tumor diameter, and higher incidence of peripheral invasion and metastasis rates. The survival of NP and PN was worse than PP; NN was consistent with NP but lower than PN from the curve. The two nomograms were validated effectively and had a moderate ability.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Li, Na et al. “Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.” Journal of hematology & oncology vol. 12,1 140. 21 Dec. 2019, doi:10.1186/s13045-019-0828-0
2. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review;Waks AG;JAMA,2019
3. Acheampong, Teofilia et al. “Incidence Trends of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes by Age and Race/Ethnicity in the US From 2010 to 2016.” JAMA network open vol. 3,8 e2013226. 3 Aug. 2020, doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13226
4. Bae, Soo Youn et al. “Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer.” BMC cancer vol. 15 138. 18 Mar. 2015, doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1121-4
5. Liu, Jin et al. “Clinical Features and Prognosis Analysis of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer with Differential Expression Levels of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.” The breast journal vol. 2022 5469163. 29 Nov. 2022, doi:10.1155/2022/5469163