Towards person-centred maternal and newborn care in Ethiopia: a mixed method study of satisfaction and experiences of care

Author:

Eshetu Tigist1,Fekadu Eshcolewyine1,Abdella Ahmed1,Mulushoa Adiyam1,Medhin Girmay1,Belina Merga1,Alem Atalay2,Keynejad Roxanne3,Robbins Tanya4,Seward Nadine3,Shennan Andrew4,Howard Louise M3,Prince Martin5,Sandall Jane4,Hanlon Charlotte3

Affiliation:

1. Addis Ababa University

2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa University

3. King’s College London

4. King’s College

5. King’s Global Health Institute, King’s College London

Abstract

Abstract Background Person-centred maternal care is associated with positive experiences in high-income countries. Little is known about the transferability of this concept to non-Western, low-income settings. We aimed to explore women’s experiences of care and investigate satisfaction with antenatal care (ANC) in relation to person-centred care and unmet psychosocial needs in rural Ethiopia. Methods Design: facility-based, convergent mixed-method study. A cross-sectional survey included 2079 consecutive women attending ANC at eight health centres. Service satisfaction was measured using a 21-item validated measure. Independent variables: (1) person-centred care (1A: receipt of information; 1B: perceived adequacy of health worker responses) and (2) unmet psychosocial needs (2A: Patient Health Questionnaire for depressive symptoms; 2B: screening questionnaire for intimate partner violence (IPV)). Linear mixed effect regression assessed hypothesized associations between person-centred care/unmet psychosocial needs and service satisfaction, accounting for clustering at the health centre level. A linked qualitative study comprised eight in-depth interviews with women accessing ANC. Structured observations of ANC consultations rated health worker competencies (n = 65) and adherence to guidance promoting person-centred care (n = 53). Qualitative data were analysed thematically and triangulated with quantitative and observational data. Results Women reported lowest satisfaction in relation to family involvement (71.5% dissatisfied) and continuity of care (65.7% dissatisfied). As hypothesised, satisfaction increased with more information received (adjusted regression coefficient (ARC) 0.96 95%CI 0.71,1.20) but reported adequacy of help from health workers did not show a dose-response relationship (test-for-trend p = 0.157). Undetected depressive symptoms (ARC − 0.21 95%CI -0.27,-0.15) and IPV (ARC − 1.52; 95%CI -2.43,-0.61) were associated with lower service satisfaction scores. Most observed consultations scored low on most indicators of person-centred care. In qualitative interviews, women valued respectful and responsive communication from health workers, which affected their willingness to disclose psychosocial problems. Triangulation of findings indicated a mismatch between what women valued about care, their reported satisfaction with care and the actual care they were observed to receive. Conclusions Systems strengthening interventions to support person-centred maternal care appear contextually relevant but need to increase women’s expectations of care and agency to demand change. Prioritization of person-centred care could improve women’s experience of maternal care and better address psychosocial needs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

2. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution;Kruk ME;Lancet Global Health,2018

3. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision;Tuncalp, Were WM;BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol,2015

4. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2005.

5. Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population;Afulani PA;Reproductive health,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3