Affiliation:
1. Clinton Health Access Initiative
2. Solina Center for International Research and Development
3. Federal Ministry of Health
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Nigeria contributes about 28.5% of the global maternal death burden and 22% of these deaths are attributable to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The World Health Organization recommends that the administration of a potent uterotonic agent within the first minute of birth is critical to preventing PPH. Studies reveal preponderance of low-quality oxytocin, misoprostol and other uterotonics in Nigeria due to substandard manufacturing practices, weak regulatory oversight, broken cold-chain systems, demanding climactic conditions (high heat; high humidity), inconsistent electricity and falsification of uterotonics. WHO, in its 2018 Recommendations, surmised heat-stable uterotonic agents may be more suitable options, depending on the context. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of heat-stable carbetocin (HSC) compared to other uterotonic options for PPH prophylaxis.
Methods
This is a health-economic evaluation to compare the occurrence of PPH events, costs, and the cost-effectiveness of introducing heat-stable carbetocin versus oxytocin+/-misoprostol for PPH prevention among women delivering in public healthcare facilities in Nigeria. The study utilized a hierarchical decision-tree model, developed from the public healthcare system perspective, that had as inputs demographical, clinical, and economical information, and generated results related to PPH events (categorized as mild-moderate and severe), PPH-related deaths, DALYs (disability adjusted life-years) on account of PPH and PPH-related direct costs to the healthcare system.
Results
The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that in a cohort of 2,548,136 deliveries in Nigeria, HSC can avert 111,652 PPH events, 12,873 severe PPH events, 31,442 DALYs, and 1,165 deaths when compared against oxytocin, at a 4.5% reduction in total cost to the health system. Similar favorable results are associated with heat-stable carbetocin when compared with misoprostol and oxytocin-misoprostol combination. The budget impact analysis revealed that HSC can lead to total cumulative savings of USD $325,114 (₦ 240,743,2931) if scaled up over a 5-year period to 17% market share of prophylactic uterotonics administered in the country.
Conclusions
Introduction of HSC for PPH prevention is a cost-effective public health intervention in Nigeria. Health-economic modeling projects HSC to be associated with lower costs to the health system while conferring better maternal health outcomes when compared to oxytocin, misoprostol, or oxytocin-misoprostol combination.
[1] At a CBN rate of ₦740.49 to 1 USD (accessed 01/09/2023)
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division., 2023 (Cited 2023 May 15). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068759.
2. World Health Organization. Maternal health in Nigeria: generating information for action. 2019 (Cited 2023 Feb 15). Available from www.who.int website: https://www.who.int/news/item/25-06-2019-maternal-health-in-nigeria-generating-information-for-action.
3. United Nations in Nigeria. United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (UNSDCF). 2023–2027. 2023 (Cited 2023 Feb 15). Available from: https://nigeria.un.org/en/214596-united-nations-sustainable-development-cooperation-framework-unsdcf-2023-2027.
4. Sheldon W, Blum J, Vogel J, Souza J, Gülmezoglu A, Winikoff B. Postpartum haemorrhage management, risks, and maternal outcomes: findings from the World Health Organization Multi-country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Mar 2014. 121:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12636.
5. Gallos ID, Williams HM, Price MJ, Merriel A, Gee H, Lissauer et al. Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD011689. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub2.