Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: A user-centred perspective

Author:

Tshering Gap1,Troeung Lakkhina1,Walton Rebecca1,Martini Angelita1

Affiliation:

1. Brightwater Care Group

Abstract

Abstract Background: Research has highlighted a need to improve the quality of clinical documentation and data within aged care and disability services in Australia to support improved regulatory reporting and ensure quality and safety of services. However, the specific causes of data quality issues within aged care and disability services and solutions for optimisation are not well understood. Objectives: This study explored aged care and disability workforce (referred to as ‘users’) experiences and perceived root causes of clinical data quality issues at a large aged care and disability services provider in Western Australia, to inform optimisation solutions. Methods: A purposive sample of n=135 participants comprising aged care, disability, (including community-based and residential-based), staff in clinical, care, administrative and/or management roles participated in user consultations. Data collection was undertaken through semi-structured interviews and web-based surveys. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis method, where themes and subthemes were derived. Results: Eight overarching causes of data and documentation quality issues were identified: 1) staff-related challenges, 2) education and training, 3) external barriers, 4) operational guidelines and procedures, 5) organisational practices and culture, 6) technological infrastructure, 7) systems design limitations, and 8) systems configuration-related challenges. Conclusion: The quality of clinical data and documentation within aged care and disability services is influenced by a complex interplay of internal and external factors. Coordinated and collaborative effort is required between service providers and the wider sector to identify behavioural and technical optimisation solutions to support safe and high-quality care and improved regulatory reporting.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference63 articles.

1. Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians;Ajami S;Acta Informatica Medica,2013

2. Al-Abdullah M, Weistroffer HR. (2011) A framework to enhance decision outcomes: Data quality perspective.

3. Almutiry OS. Data quality assessment instrument for electronic health record systems in saudi arabia. Ph.D.: University of Southampton (United Kingdom), England; 2017.

4. Austalian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (n.d.). Healthcare Records. Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards/clinical-governance-standard/patient-safety-and-quality-systems/action-116 (accessed 10/10/2023).

5. Austalian Institute of Health and Welfare. People with disability in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3