Understanding the relationship between the frequency of HbA1c monitoring, HbA1c changes over time, and the achievement of targets: a retrospective cohort study

Author:

Mukonda Elton1,Westhuizen Diederick J van der2,Dave Joel A3,Cleary Susan4,Hannan Luke1,Lesosky Maia5,Rusch Jody A2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town

2. Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town

3. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town, Cape Town

4. Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town

5. Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool

Abstract

Abstract Background The goal of post-diagnosis diabetes management is the achievement and maintenance of glycaemic control. Most clinical practice guidelines recommend 3–6 monthly HbA1c monitoring. Despite this guidance, there are few data supporting the impact of monitoring frequency on clinical outcomes, particularly from low- and middle-income country settings. This study examined associations between adherence to monitoring recommendations and the achievement of HbA1c targets, and HbA1c changes, over time in a South African cohort. Research Design and Methods: The study utilised routinely collected HbA1c test data on patients with diabetes aged ≥ 18 years in the Western and Northern Cape between 2015 and 2020 to examine the relationship between mean change in HbA1c values and the duration between consecutive HbA1c tests (retest interval). The monitoring adherence rate, which represents the proportion of intervals between consecutive tests that met South Africa’s guideline recommendations, was calculated for each patient. Multistate modelling and linear mixed-effects modelling were then used to examine the effect of monitoring adherence on the achievement of glycemic control targets and longitudinal changes in HbA1c. Results The 132,859 diabetes patients with repeat tests had a median of three HbA1c test requests, a median follow-up time of 2.3 years and a median retest interval of 10.3 months. A retest interval 2–4 months maximised the downward trajectory in HbA1c, while individuals with low adherence to the monitoring guidelines were the least likely to achieve glycaemic control in one year. Moreover, patients with low monitoring adherence had higher mean HbA1c levels compared to patients with moderate or high monitoring adherence. Conclusions The results illustrated the importance of adherence to monitoring recommendations as adherent patients had better glycaemic control and lower mean HbA1c levels over time.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3