Efficacy and safety analysis of a new hemostatic gelatin matrix for spinal surgery: A randomized controlled study

Author:

Gao Ran1,Yang Xiaowei1,Zhang Bi1,xu jiaqiang1,Liang Wen1,Xie Banglin1,Zhang Bin1,Guo Runshegn1,Lai Qi1

Affiliation:

1. First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new hemostatic gelatin matrix for use in spinal surgery. Methods From September to December 2020, 54 patients from our hospital were recruited and randomly allocated to a test group or a control group using computer-generated randomization codes. In the test group, the new hemostatic gelatin matrix was used; in the control group, the Surgiflo™ Hemostatic Matrix was used. All operations for both groups were performed by a senior physician, and the following measures were recorded for comparison: (i) rates of successful hemostasis at 5 min; (ii) time to hemostasis; (iii) blood pressure (BP); (iv) red blood (RBC) cell count; and (v) hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the preoperative period, 1st to 2nd postoperative days, and 42nd postoperative day. Adverse events following surgery were also compared. Results All patients were followed up for at least 6 weeks. In the test group, 24 and 2 cases achieved and did not achieve hemostasis within 5 min, respectively. In the control group, 23 and 2 cases achieved and did not achieve hemostasis within 5 min, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.967). The time to hemostasis, BP, RBC, and Hb in the preoperative period, on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days, and 42nd postoperative day also showed no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The new hemostatic gelatin matrix has the same efficacy and safety as that of Surgiflo™ Hemostatic Matrix.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study;Ma L;Medicine (Baltimore),2018

2. Hemostatic efficacy of EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch vs. TachoSil® in a heparinized swine spleen incision model;Matonick JP;J Invest Surg,2014

3. Safety biocompatibility of gelatin hemostatic matrix (FloSeal and Surgiflo) in neurosurgical procedures;Gazzeri R;Surg Technol Int,2012

4. Nano hemostat solution: immediate hemostasis at the nanoscale;Ellis-Behnke RG;Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med,2006

5. Transfusion of blood products in trauma: an update;Fraga GP;J Emerg Med,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3