Factors Determining Time Allocation of a Multiple-Choice Question Examination: The Students’ Perspective

Author:

Kreepala Chatchai1,Thongsombat Srunwas2,Wattanavaekin Krittanont3,Danjittrong Taechasit4,Keeratibharat Nattawut1,Juntararuangtong Thitikorn1

Affiliation:

1. Suranaree University of Technology

2. Prince of Songkla University

3. Mahidol University

4. Chulabhorn Hospital

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction: The MCQ is one of the objective assessment methods. It is proper to evaluate the cognitive domain of learners with high objectivity. However, there are no definite criteria for determining the appropriate exam time. The ability to comprehend the meaning of a text, when reading, cannot be directly applied to reading for decision-making or answering questions. The authors were interested in exploring the aspects of the medical students’ perspective about the factors affecting their discission on MCQs answering. Materials and Methods The study was conducted at the Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand. The authors utilized a mixed method that consisted of a quantitative approach and a sequential, explanatory approach. Survey research was used as the part quantitative technique meanwhile the semi-structured interview was used in qualitative data analysis for collecting the data. Results The questionnaire was done online by the participants from second to fifth-year medical students. It was found that there were 298 respondents. The qualitative analysis indicated that there were five domains, including the total word count of tests, non-native English examiners, test difficulty, images in tests, and atmosphere of the examination affecting the testing time. Conclusion This report indicated that the data acquired from comprehensive reading examination should be distinguished from decisive reading examination. Apart from the length of text, the question taxonomy such as recall or application as well as questions with given images and tables should be considered as factors determining time allocation of a MCQ examination.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Arif, A. S., & Stuerzlinger, W. (Eds.). (2009). Analysis of text entry performance metrics. 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH); : IEEE.

2. Logistic regression analysis to predict medical licensing examination of thailand (MLET) step 1 success or failure;Wanvarie S;Annals-Academy of Medicine Singapore,2007

3. Item analysis of multiple-choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool;Kumar D;Med J Armed Forces India,2021

4. Gallistel, C. R. (2008). Learning and representation. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. ; 1:227 – 42.

5. Simon, H. A. (1990). Bounded rationality (pp. 15–18). Utility and probability: Springer.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3