Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract

Author:

Zarei-Ghanavati Saimak,Nikpayam Majid,Namdari Maral,Bakhtiari Elham,Hassanzadeh Samira1,Ziaei Mohammed

Affiliation:

1. Mashhad university of medical sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain OCT optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated Swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates. Methods In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOL Master 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.0.02 and − 0.02 ± 0.03 for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.10 ± 0.03 (p < 0.05) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 (p < 0.05) and 0.001 ± 0.04 for LT, and − 2.29 ± 0.92 (p < 0.05) and 0.73 ± 1.43 for CCT. There was a good correlation between devices for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (ICC > 0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 in measuring AL. Conclusion Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements can not be considered interchangeable between these devices.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3