Affiliation:
1. Griffith University
2. Simon Fraser University
3. Chinese University of Hong Kong
4. Alluvium Consulting
5. University of the Western Cape
6. University of Aveiro
7. University of British Colombia
Abstract
Abstract
Global Theories of Change (ToCs), such as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), provide broad, overarching guidance for achieving conservation goals. However, broad guidance cannot inform how conservation actions will lead to desired outcomes. We provide a framework for translating a global-scale ToC into focussed, ecosystem-specific ToCs that consider feasibility of actions, as determined by national socioeconomic and political context (i.e., enabling conditions). We demonstrate the framework using coastal wetland ecosystems as a case study. We identified six distinct multinational profiles of enabling conditions (‘enabling profiles’) for coastal wetland conservation. For countries belonging to enabling profiles with high internal capacity to enable conservation, we described plausible ToCs that involved strengthening policy and regulation. Alternatively, for enabling profiles with low internal enabling capacity, plausible ToCs typically required formalising community-led conservation. Our ‘enabling profile’ framework could be applied to other ecosystems to help operationalise the post-2020 GBF.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Using Theory of Change to improve post-2020 conservation: A proposed framework and recommendations for use;Rice WS;Conserv Sci Pract,2020
2. CBD. First draft of the post-2020 global-biodiversity framework. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/914a/eca3/24ad42235033f0 (2021).
3. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework;Milner-Gulland EJ;One Earth,2021
4. Evidence-Based Causal Chains for Linking Health, Development, and Conservation Actions;Qiu J;Bioscience,2018
5. Assessing the risk of carbon dioxide emissions from blue carbon ecosystems;Lovelock CE;Front Ecol Environ,2017