The Efficacy and Safety of Using Prophylactic Antibiotics Perioperative Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Author:

Arnaout Ahmad Yamen1,Atli Abd Alazeez1,Nerabani Yaman1,Hamdan Ola1,Dabbagh Ezeddin1,Alhejazi Tala Jouma1,Kadoura Lama2,Masri Ruqaya2,Bsata Adel2,Kayali Hasan2,Mahli Nehad2,Al-Haj Ahmad2,Ayoub Kusay2,Niazi Ammar2,Ghazal Ahmad2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo

2. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo

Abstract

Abstract Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended by many guidelines for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the effectiveness and safety of this measure remain controversial due to the fact that most recommendations are based on old and low-quality evidence. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Aleppo University Hospital between February 1, 2022 and November 30, 2022 were involved in the study. Inclusion criteria included: laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, aged between 18 and 90, and patients who accepted to participate in our study. While exclusion criteria included: open cholecystectomy. Results: There was no significant difference in the difficulty of surgical work or perioperative medications between groups. Thirty Complications happened included Wound infection (N=12, PAG = 1, NAG =11; P =0.07), Urinary Tract Infection (N=4 , PAG = 1 , NAG =3 ;P=0.314), bleeding (N=2, PAG = 1, NAG =1; P=0.175), Acute pancreatitis (N=2, PAG = 1, NAG =1; P=0.175), prolonged shoulder pain (N= , PAG =0 , NAG =2 ;P=0.165), intra-abdominal abscess (N=1, PAG =0, NAG =1; P=0.198), Bile leak (N=1, PAG = 1, NAG =0; P=0.056), and other (N=8, PAG = 2, NAG =6; P=0.2). While no case of renal, respiratory (pneumonia), CVA, or Venous thromboembolism complication was recorded during the follow-up period for both groups. Thirteen patients required unplanned readmission and one death occurred in the antibiotic group. Only one case needed ICU care in the antibiotic group. There was a tendency for more complications in patients who did not receive antibiotics in most subgroups, but these results were not statistically significant and require further study with larger patient numbers to determine significance. Conclusion: The medical literature is still unable to answer whether to use PA or not. We tried to cover all possible types of LC and follow them up for a sufficient period. However, future studies with larger samples are needed to solve the debate and improve the present guidelines.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;Brand M;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2010

2. Versus E, Cholecystectomy D, Trial AMR, Kipfm K. Acute Cholecystitis. 2013;258(3):385–93.

3. World Health Organization: global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection;Leaper DJ;J Hosp Infect,2017

4. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery;Bratzler DW;Am J Health-System Pharm,2013

5. Meta-analysis of perioperative antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy;Pasquali S;Br J Surg,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3