Abstract
Objectives
The primary aim was to investigate the impact of the three-dimensional (3D) characterization on clinical and therapeutic decisions for mandibular second molar (M2M) impaction. The secondary aim was to introduce a validated 3D classification system incorporating both surgical and orthodontic parameters.
Materials and methods
Bidimensional (2D) and 3D radiological records of 15 impacted M2M were collected and deidentified. Ten experienced clinicians(5 oral surgeons;5 orthodontists) categorized each case, first based on 2D records and then with 3D scans. The primary outcome variable was the assessment of differences in diagnosis and decision-making protocol using 2D or 3D records (clinical relevance:from 0 to 5). The secondary outcome variable was the validation analysis of the proposed 3D classification to determine the concordance among clinicians. Descriptive statistics and multivariable inferential analysis based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) were performed(α = 0.05).
Results
3D examination allowed a better visualization of M2M impaction with higher clinical relevance for diagnosis of M2M root relationship to alveolar nerve and lingual plate, its depth and inclination(range:2.69–3.43). The proposed 3D classification of M2M impaction changed clinical decisions regarding surgical-orthodontic approach, biomechanics, patient education, and treatment time estimate(range:2.59–3.33). In the validation analysis of the classification, no evidence of inter- or intra-group (surgeon/orthodontist) bias in score attribution occurred(null model:AIC = 718.04).
Conclusion
3D evaluation of impacted M2Ms could enhance diagnostic accuracy, and a classification system was proposed and validated by a group of experienced surgeons and orthodontists with high concordance.