Affiliation:
1. IHU Strasbourg
2. Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS)
3. UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
4. IRCAD
5. University Hospitals of Strasbourg
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (cancer of the anus, rectum, cervix). Direct irradiation adversely affects ovarian and endometrial function, compromising the fertility of women. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field, surgical procedures to displace the uterus are investigational. This study demonstrates the surgical options for uterine displacement in relation to the radiation dose received.
Methods
The uterine displacement techniques were carried out sequentially in a human female cadaver to demonstrate each procedure step by step and assess the uterine positions with dosimetric CT scans in a hybrid operating room. Two treatment plans (anal and rectal cancer) were simulated on each of the four dosimetric scans (1. anatomical position, 2. uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 3. ventrofixation of the uterine fundus at the umbilical level, 4. uterine transposition). Treatments were planned on Eclipse® System (Varian Medical Systems®,USA) using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. Data about maximum (Dmax) and mean (Dmean) radiation dose received and the volume receiving 14Gy (V14Gy) were collected.
Results
All procedures were completed without technical complications. In the rectal cancer simulation with delivery of 50Gy to the tumor, Dmax, Dmean and V14Gy to the uterus were respectively 52,8Gy, 34,3Gy and 30,5cc (1), 31,8Gy, 20,2Gy and 22.0cc (2), 24,4Gy, 6,8Gy and 5,5cc (3), 1,8Gy, 0,6Gy and 0,0cc (4). For anal cancer, delivering 64Gy to the tumor respectively 46,7Gy, 34,8Gy and 31,3cc (1), 34,3Gy, 20,0Gy and 21,5cc (2), 21,8Gy, 5,9Gy and 2,6cc (3), 1,4Gy, 0,7Gy and 0,0cc (4).
Conclusions
The feasibility of several uterine displacement procedures was safely demonstrated. Increasing distance to the radiation field requires more complex surgical interventions to minimize radiation exposure. Surgical strategy needs to be tailored to the multidisciplinary treatment plan, and uterine transposition is the most technically complex with the least dose received.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Fertility preservation in chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer: A combined approach;Mariani S;Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology,2019
2. Cancer today [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 23]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
3. Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Trachelectomy with Prophylactic Cerclage: A Safe Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early Stage Cervical Cancer;Pavone M;Ann Surg Oncol,2023
4. Mean Age of Mothers is on the Rise: United States, 2000–2014;Mathews TJ;NCHS Data Brief,2016
5. The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte;Wallace WHB;Hum Reprod,2003