Affiliation:
1. Ningxia Medical University
2. General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To compare the efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux sodium (FPX), and rivaroxaban after total hip arthroplasty (THA) under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).
Method
The clinical data of patients who underwent primary THA due to hip joint disease in Ningxia Medical University General Hospital from October 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. According to different anticoagulant methods, patients were divided into LMWH group (42 cases), FPX group (24 cases), and Rivaroxaban group (39 cases). Detect and record changes of blood coagulation-related factors, D-dimer, platelet (PLT) changes, blood routine, blood loss, lower limb vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and allogeneic blood transfusion in the three groups perioperatively.
Result
There was no statistical significance in the comparison of coagulation indexes before the operation among the three groups (P > 0.05), but there was statistical significance in the comparison of PT and INR levels at 3 days after the operation (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the Hb before operation and the Hct 3 days after operation in the three groups (P < 0.05). The postoperative drainage volume and overt blood loss of the three groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, and total blood loss (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score, blood transfusion rate, and DVT incidence rate among the three groups before and 3 days after surgery (P > 0.05), and the treatment cost ratio of patients in LMWH group was lower than that of FPX group and Rivaroxaban group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Based on the ERAS concept, the use of LMWH, FPX, and Rivaroxaban after THA can effectively and safely prevent the occurrence of VTE and has no significant difference in postoperative pain, perioperative blood loss, and coagulation function. However, Rivaroxaban can be taken orally directly and has more advantages in pharmacological effects, while LMWH is cheaper and more economical.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Papalia R, Campi S, Vorini F, Zampogna B, Vasta S, Papalia G, Fossati C, Torre G, Denaro V. The Role of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly. J Clin Med. 2020 May 9;9(5):1401.
2. A systematic review of economic models for cost effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total knee and hip replacement;Fatoye F;Physiotherapy,2022
3. Twenty-year accelerated development of artificial joints in China;Ke-Rong D;Chin J Joint Surg,2015
4. Bawa H, Weick JW, Dirschl DR, Luu HH. Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis and Deep Vein Thrombosis Rates After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Oct 1;26(19):698–705.
5. etal. Aspirin or Rivaroxaban for VTE Prophylaxis after Hip or Knee Arthroplasty;Anderson DR;N Engl J Med,2018