Exploring Pharmacy Students’ Perceptions and Comfort Levels with Peer-Conducted Blood Pressure Examinations

Author:

Ahmed Fahamina1,Beganovic Meva2,Zeini Fatima,Borghol Amne1,Smith Candice1

Affiliation:

1. Xavier University of Louisiana

2. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Various methods are used to assess healthcare professional students’ physical exam skills. Hypertension is a common chronic disease that affects nearly half of adults in the United States, therefore measuring blood pressure is a clinical skill often assessed in a healthcare program curriculum. Methods: This study was conducted to gather data and analyze certain characteristics regarding the views of second year pharmacy students having their blood pressure assessed by their classmates in a hypertension skills lab. These views were collected using Qualtrics™, a voluntary, anonymous electronic survey. Results: Eighty-five respondents (~82% reposnse rate) were included in this survey analysis. Majority of the students were between the age of 18-24 years (75%), female (79%), and African American (56%). Most students reported feeling comfortable (82%) having their blood pressure assessed by their peer, with no significant difference when considering racial/ethnic groups, age, gender, or family history (P>0.05). Conclusions: Although there was no statistical significance found amongst the various analyses, these outcomes displayed insight into a subject that may need to be further explored. Since numerous factors can vary between the student and examiner, comfort levels and personal preferences should be of importance.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference22 articles.

1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension Cascade: Hypertension Prevalence, Treatment and Control Estimates Among U.S. Adults Aged 18 Years and Older Applying the Criteria from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association’s 2017 Hypertension Guideline—NHANES 2017–2020. Atlanta, GA: May 12, 2023. Accessed August 11,2023.

2. 2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:e127-e248.

3. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Know your risk for high blood pressure. https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/risk_factors.htm. Accessed August 1, 2023.

4. 4. J.C. McLachlan, P. White, L. Donnelly & D. Patten (2010) Student attitudes to peer physical examination: A qualitative study of changes in expressed willingness to participate, Medical Teacher, 32:2, e101-e105, DOI: 10.3109/01421590903202504

5. 5. Chang EH, Power DV. Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Acad Med. 2000 Apr;75(4) 384–389. doi:10.1097/00001888-200004000-00020. PMID: 10893124.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3