Determining the clinicopathological significance of the VI-RADS true-positive group: A retrospective study

Author:

Ikuma Shunsuke1,Akatsuka Jun1,Takeda Hayato1,Endo Yuki1,Hamasaki Tsutomu1,Kimura Go1,Kondo Yukihiro1

Affiliation:

1. Nippon Medical School Hospital

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is widely used as a diagnostic method for predicting muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological significance of the VI-RADS true-positive (TP) group.MethodsWe performed 333 transurethral resections of bladder tumors (TURBT) at our hospital between January 2019 and April 2021, and included 125 patients who underwent preoperative Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into this study. The patients were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma (UC). We first compared the results of patients with VI-RADS scores of 3 and 4 to determine the cut-off values for MIBC; thereafter, the 125 patients were divided into TP, false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), and false-negative (FN) groups using VI-RADS. The clinicopathological significance of the TP group was examined by retrospectively comparing the characteristics of each group.ResultsA total of 125 cases were examined, out of which 29 were pathologically diagnosed with MIBC. Of the 29 MIBC cases, 4 (13.8%) had a VI-RADS score of ≤ 3 and 25 (86.2%) had a VI-RADS score of ≥ 4. Of the 96 Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) cases, 83 (86.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≤ 3 and 13 (13.5%) had a VI-RADS score of ≥ 4. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS with a cutoff value of 4 was 87.1% for sensitivity, 86.5% for specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87. In contrast, for a cutoff value of 3, the sensitivity was 90.3%, specificity was 61.5%, and AUC was 0.76. In this study, a VI-RADS score of ≥ 4 could predict MIBC. In the TP group, all 25 patients had high-grade tumors. The TP group had significantly more high-grade bladder cancers than the other groups (TP vs. TN, p = 0.001; TP vs. FP, p = 0.009; and TP vs. FN, p = 0.0278). In addition, the TP group had more tumor necrosis (TP vs. TN, p = 0.001; TP vs. FP, p = 0.0045) and more UC variant cases (TP vs. TN, p = 0.0012; TP vs. FP, p = 0.0217) than the TN and FP groups.ConclusionThis study suggests that VI-RADS has a high diagnostic performance in predicting MIBC, and that VI-RADS could diagnose high-grade tumors, necrosis, and UC variants.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3